Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.9 and 3.5.4

2022-10-03 Thread Francesco Chicchiriccò
+1 Thanks Daniel. Regards. On 03/10/22 20:05, Daniel Kulp wrote: This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. Staging repository: (I forgot to close the repo between builds so only a single staging repository that has both versions) https://repository.apache.org/content/repos

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.9 and 3.5.4

2022-10-03 Thread Andriy Redko
+1, thanks a lot Dan! Best Regards, Andriy Redko DK> This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. DK> Staging repository: (I forgot to close the repo between builds so only a single staging repository that has both versions) DK> https://repository.apache.org/content/repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.9 and 3.5.4

2022-10-03 Thread Jeff Genender
+1 Jeff > On Oct 3, 2022, at 12:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > > This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. > > > Staging repository: (I forgot to close the repo between builds so only a > single staging repository that has both versions) > https://repository.apache.

[VOTE] Apache CXF 3.4.9 and 3.5.4

2022-10-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
This is a vote to release the latest set of patched for CXF. Staging repository: (I forgot to close the repo between builds so only a single staging repository that has both versions) https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1182/ Tags: https://gitbox.apache.org/re

Re: [RELEASE REQUEST] Next 3.x release?

2022-10-03 Thread Daniel Kulp
> On Oct 3, 2022, at 5:16 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > Hi @Daniel Kulp , > > We're all done now for the next 3.4.x/3.5.x releases, if it's > convenient for you to do the releases? Yep. I’ll work on that this afternoon. Thanks! Dan > > Colm. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:43 PM Col

Re: [RELEASE REQUEST] Next 3.x release?

2022-10-03 Thread Colm O hEigeartaigh
Hi @Daniel Kulp , We're all done now for the next 3.4.x/3.5.x releases, if it's convenient for you to do the releases? Colm. On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 4:43 PM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > Cool thanks. I'll spend another day or so looking at what should be > backmerged. > > Colm. > > On Thu, Se