Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0

+1 Jeff > On Feb 8, 2022, at 9:57 AM, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0. It is a new major > release that contains updates to CXF (3.5.0), Spring 5 and Log4J 2 > (2.17.1), amongst some other minor dependencies. > > Artifacts: > https://repository

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0

+1 Thanks Colm! Freeman On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 11:57 AM Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0. It is a new major > release that contains updates to CXF (3.5.0), Spring 5 and Log4J 2 > (2.17.1), amongst some other minor dependencies. > > Artifacts: > https

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0

+1 On 2/8/22, Colm O hEigeartaigh wrote: > This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0. It is a new major > release that contains updates to CXF (3.5.0), Spring 5 and Log4J 2 > (2.17.1), amongst some other minor dependencies. > > Artifacts: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositorie

Re: [VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0

+1, thanks Colm! Best Regards, Andriy Redko COh> This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0. It is a new major COh> release that contains updates to CXF (3.5.0), Spring 5 and Log4J 2 COh> (2.17.1), amongst some other minor dependencies. COh> Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/co

[VOTE] - Release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0

This is a vote to release Apache CXF Fediz 1.6.0. It is a new major release that contains updates to CXF (3.5.0), Spring 5 and Log4J 2 (2.17.1), amongst some other minor dependencies. Artifacts: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecxf-1171/ Git tag: https://github.com/apach

[GitHub] [cxf] rmartinc opened a new pull request #904: [CXF-8655] Incorrect XSD resolution when the file name is the same in different folders

rmartinc opened a new pull request #904: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/904 Issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8655 As commented in the Jira the three lines added in [CXF-6717](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-6717) for "urn" are removed. If you prefe

Re: Regression on classpath tolerance in 3.5?

Sure, here it is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8654 :) Think it is simple enough to not be worth a PR but happy to jump on it if it helps too. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog

Re: Regression on classpath tolerance in 3.5?

Hey Romain, Sneaked in while we were fixing the JAX-RS TCK tests, certainly should be optional, could you please create a JIRA ticket? Thank you. Best Regards, Andriy Redko RMB> Hi all, RMB> Is there a known regression in 3.5.0 regarding the optional status of RMB> javax.activation? RMB

[GitHub] [cxf] reta merged pull request #903: Update Swagger to 2.1.13

reta merged pull request #903: URL: https://github.com/apache/cxf/pull/903 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cxf.apa

Regression on classpath tolerance in 3.5?

Hi all, Is there a known regression in 3.5.0 regarding the optional status of javax.activation? I'm more particularly pointing org.apache.cxf.jaxrs.utils.JAXRSUtils which requires its presence whereas it should be optional AFAIK so InputStreamDataSource shouldn't be hardcoded IMO. Wdyt? Romain