Re: Preparing for DOSGi RI 1.3 release

2012-01-24 Thread David Bosschaert
+1 on including the enterprise jar. It should also replace the compendium jar if that's currently mentioned in the project... Cheers, David On 24 January 2012 18:37, jbert wrote: > I second the need for the enterprise API jar. > > I would also like to note that the POMs in trunk still need to b

split-packages, osgi bundles, etc.....

2012-01-24 Thread Daniel Kulp
I just committed some changes that change the features.xml on trunk to use the modularized bundles instead of the big bundle. It's definitely not complete yet, but consider it a starting point to attempt some testing.:-) Right now, I know I have a few issue to resolve: 1) API loading CXF

Re: CXF website, svnpubsub, javadocs, etc....

2012-01-24 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 for 2) In Eclipse I always get the sources and so also javadoc from maven so I only use javadoc on the web when I want to use google to search something and then the trunk or the latest release is good enough. Christian Am 24.01.2012 18:49, schrieb Daniel Kulp: As most of you are aware

Re: Preparing for DOSGi RI 1.3 release

2012-01-24 Thread jbert
I second the need for the enterprise API jar. I would also like to note that the POMs in trunk still need to be changed to point to the org.osgi.enterprise JAR, right now they're still pointing to the remoteadmin project. This means that the current sources cannot be built unless you check out a r

Re: CXF website, svnpubsub, javadocs, etc....

2012-01-24 Thread Eric Johnson
I think 2) is sufficient. Most people will be looking for the Javadocs for the latest version of the one of the supported releases. I'm all for more information versus less information, but keeping every version of the Javadocs on the Web site starts getting to the point of diminishing returns.Eric

CXF website, svnpubsub, javadocs, etc....

2012-01-24 Thread Daniel Kulp
As most of you are aware, most of the CXF website is generated from content hosted in Confluence. That really works well. For the past year or so, we've used a process from my crontab on p.a.o to generate the site from the confluence content. Again, hasn't been an issue and it works fairly

Re: svn commit: r1227691

2012-01-24 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Aki On 05/01/12 16:49, a...@apache.org wrote: Author: ay Date: Thu Jan 5 16:49:56 2012 New Revision: 1227691 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1227691&view=rev Log: [CXF-4013] Enhancing the element-append and drop options of OutTransformWriter I've finally updated the documentation [