Re: Ancient JIRA issues....

2011-09-07 Thread Freeman Fang
On 2011-9-8, at 上午12:27, Daniel Kulp wrote: I was kind of poking around to see how some other projects handle feature requests for things likely not to ever be implemented as we're a similar situations. We have a bunch of JIRA's logged years ago for new features, but no one has steppe

Re: Ancient JIRA issues....

2011-09-07 Thread Eric Johnson
+1 to clearing out some of the cruft. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I was kind of poking around to see how some other projects handle feature > requests  for things likely not to ever be implemented as we're a similar > situations.  We have a bunch of JIRA's logged years

Re: Ancient JIRA issues....

2011-09-07 Thread Christian Schneider
Definately a good thing. It helps to concentrate on the active issues. Christian Am 07.09.2011 18:27, schrieb Daniel Kulp: I was kind of poking around to see how some other projects handle feature requests for things likely not to ever be implemented as we're a similar situations. We have a

Re: Ancient JIRA issues....

2011-09-07 Thread Benson Margulies
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I was kind of poking around to see how some other projects handle feature > requests  for things likely not to ever be implemented as we're a similar > situations.  We have a bunch of JIRA's logged years ago for new features, but > no one has

Ancient JIRA issues....

2011-09-07 Thread Daniel Kulp
I was kind of poking around to see how some other projects handle feature requests for things likely not to ever be implemented as we're a similar situations. We have a bunch of JIRA's logged years ago for new features, but no one has stepped up to implement them. A couple projects have a ps

Re: Adjusting WS-RM systests for http 202

2011-09-07 Thread Aki Yoshida
2011/9/6 Daniel Kulp : > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 3:22:39 PM Aki Yoshida wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> I submitted the patch for this CXF-3768 in trunk. >> As this issue was raised for 2.4.2., I was thinking of integrating >> this patch into 2.4.x. >> >> But after reading your question, I was not sure