Re: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
There's another option I just thought of: Remove all the ant things from all the CURRENT samples. Then add a single "antbuild" sample that is pretty much just "hello world", but would show how to setup wsdl2java and such from within ant. That limits the ant exposure to a single, dedicated s

Re: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Freeman Fang
I mean remove the ant in example entirely, that's option 1. my +1 for option 1 Freeman On 2011-3-16, at 上午11:35, Freeman Fang wrote: Hi Dan, I think it's the time to remove ant support entirely in our example. We have both mvn and ant in the examples for several releases, IMHO, we give eno

Re: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Freeman Fang
Hi Dan, I think it's the time to remove ant support entirely in our example. We have both mvn and ant in the examples for several releases, IMHO, we give enough time for ant users to get used to mvn already, so my +1 for option 2. Freeman On 2011-3-15, at 下午9:20, Daniel Kulp wrote: Righ

Re: LogBrowser project is on the trunk

2011-03-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tuesday 15 March 2011 6:25:14 PM Tomasz Oponowicz wrote: > > Probably one open issue is to figure out what to do with different .js > > scripts. ? The scripts which are in the rt/management-web module, can > > they be Apache licensed ? Dan - what do you think ? > > There are: > > * json2.min.j

Re: LogBrowser project is on the trunk

2011-03-15 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi > Probably one open issue is to figure out what to do with different .js > > scripts. ? The scripts which are in the rt/management-web module, can > they > > be Apache licensed ? Dan - what do you think ? > > There are: > > * json2.min.js - Public Domain; > * uuid.min.js - Dual licensed under t

Re: LogBrowser project is on the trunk

2011-03-15 Thread Tomasz Oponowicz
Hi Sergey, On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi Tomasz >> >> > Can you do a sanity check please and confirm that only those filter >> > fields >> > which are selected are added to the URI ? >> > Example, if the filter becomes empty then the query is set to null/empty >>

Re: LogBrowser project is on the trunk

2011-03-15 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Tomasz > > Can you do a sanity check please and confirm that only those filter > fields > > which are selected are added to the URI ? > > Example, if the filter becomes empty then the query is set to null/empty > > value, if only the 'from' date field selected then it is > > > > _s=date=lt=201

Re: LogBrowser project is on the trunk

2011-03-15 Thread Tomasz Oponowicz
Hi Sergey, On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi Tomasz > > thanks for your effort, comments inline, > >> At the moment URL looks like: >> >> >> s?_s=date=ge=2011-03-07;date=lt=2011-03-07;level==DEBUG,level==INFO,level==WARN,level==ERROR >> > > There is one more update nee

Re: WSS4J related compilation problem

2011-03-15 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Colm's merge fixed it, thanks Sergey On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > Probably need a "mvn -U -cpu" type thing to grab the latest WSS4J jars. > > Dan > > > On Tuesday 15 March 2011 10:35:02 AM Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm seeing the following compilation pr

Re: WSS4J related compilation problem

2011-03-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
Probably need a "mvn -U -cpu" type thing to grab the latest WSS4J jars. Dan On Tuesday 15 March 2011 10:35:02 AM Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi, > > I'm seeing the following compilation problem after removing the WSS4J jars > from the local repository and rebuilding: > > [ERROR] > .../rt/ws/sec

Re: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Glen Mazza
(1)'s my first choice, I can help with the Mavenization of the samples (standard directory structure) if we go that route. Reasons: 1.) Providing Ant builds is for the benefit of those developers whose capabilities are between what is needed to use Ant and what is needed to use Maven (anyone pas

Re: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Eric Johnson
I think 2 is a better option for a general audience. Not everyone will want to use Maven and leaving a few Ant ready examples in place will help non-Maven users see how to set up their environment. >From a maintenance perspective getting rid of the samples-lib folder and any Ant build scripts that

Re: SeachConditionBuilder for CXF JAX-RS clients

2011-03-15 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi Andy Thanks a million - I do hope this builder will help users to experiment with FIQL. Cheers, Sergey On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Andrzej Michalec < andrzej.micha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Refactoring is done, SearchConditionBuilder is factory now, removed > unnecessary "query" operation,

Re: SeachConditionBuilder for CXF JAX-RS clients

2011-03-15 Thread Andrzej Michalec
Refactoring is done, SearchConditionBuilder is factory now, removed unnecessary "query" operation, plus renamed "build" into "query". cheers, -andy. -- View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/SeachConditionBuilder-for-CXF-JAX-RS-clients-tp3357826p3707706.html Sent from the

AW: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Oliver Wulff
Hi Dan I just wanted to raise the same question right now and propose to remove all the ant related artificats within CXF. +1 for 1) Oli Von: Daniel Kulp [dk...@apache.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. März 2011 14:20 An: dev@cxf.apache.org Betreff: Proposal

WSS4J related compilation problem

2011-03-15 Thread Sergey Beryozkin
Hi, I'm seeing the following compilation problem after removing the WSS4J jars from the local repository and rebuilding: [ERROR] .../rt/ws/security/src/main/java/org/apache/cxf/ws/security/wss4j/WSS4JInInterceptor.java:[528,32] getPasswordCB(java.lang.String,int,javax.security.auth.callback.Callb

AW: Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Oliver Wulff
I just wanted to raise the same question right now and propose to remove all the ant related artificats within CXF. But let's see how many people still uses Ant. +1 for 1) Oli Von: Daniel Kulp [dk...@apache.org] Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. März 2011 14:20

Proposal: drop ant build.xml files for samples requiring extra stuff.....

2011-03-15 Thread Daniel Kulp
Right now, we have a samples-lib directory that contains some extra libs that CXF doesn't require for anything, but various samples do. I'd like to go ahead and remove that directory and the build.xml for samples that require it. We have Maven poms for all the samples so the sample would sti