Re: Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi, I reproduced this error and it is caused by SpringBeansTest is not shutdown the bus rightly. So I created a JIRA[1] for it and will commit a fix shortly. [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3326 Willem On 2/10/11 7:18 AM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: Oh, and I'm running "mvn clean in

Re: Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
On 02/10/2011 02:05 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > Your tests are definitely running in a different order that mine. You coudl > try doing a "touch" on the RountripTest.java and seeing if that changes the > order. > > I just committed changes to the poms to force it into alpha order. (I > thought >

Re: Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 7:44:42 pm Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > On 02/10/2011 01:37 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 February 2011 6:17:07 pm Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > >> I'm getting a test failure with Simple Frontend: > > Hmm... no idea. Hudson is passing and I cannot reproduce it.

Re: Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
On 02/10/2011 01:37 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > On Wednesday 09 February 2011 6:17:07 pm Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > >> I'm getting a test failure with Simple Frontend: >> >> > Hmm... no idea. Hudson is passing and I cannot reproduce it. Can you try > going into the directory and running jus

Re: WSDL validator tool and WS-I checks

2011-02-09 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Hi Robert, You might be interested in my just-published article on "Understanding and modeling WSDL 1.1": http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-jws20/index.html (This discussion reminded me of the CXF tool, and I've requested added a link to that as a resource.) The next one covers extending

Re: Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 6:17:07 pm Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > I'm getting a test failure with Simple Frontend: > Hmm... no idea. Hudson is passing and I cannot reproduce it. Can you try going into the directory and running just: mvn -Dtest=RountripTes and seeing if it fails by itself.

Re: Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Oh, and I'm running "mvn clean install" with Maven 2.2.1. - Dennis On 02/10/2011 12:17 PM, Dennis Sosnoski wrote: > I'm getting a test failure with Simple Frontend: > > --- > T E S T S > --

Build failure

2011-02-09 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
I'm getting a test failure with Simple Frontend: --- T E S T S --- Running org.apache.cxf.frontend.soap.SoapBindingSelectionTest Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:

Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?

2011-02-09 Thread James Carr
Monster Energy drink? That's not a reward, that's a punishment. :) On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 1:40 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: > Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's > become partial to other beverages). > > Glen > > On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: >> >> Is

Re: Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?

2011-02-09 Thread Glen Mazza
Hmm, seems like the CXF team owes Aaron a Monster energy drink (unless he's become partial to other beverages). Glen On 09.02.2011 14:00, Pieper, Aaron wrote: Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id

Typo in LoggingInInterceptor constructor?

2011-02-09 Thread Pieper, Aaron
Is there a typo in the LoggingInInterceptor(String,String) constructor? It seems to inaccurately call super(id, id) instead of super(id, phase). I'm looking at r1058274 which appears to be the latest: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/trunk/rt/core/src/main/java/org/apache/ cxf/interceptor/Loggi

Re: Use confluence wiki for ... wiki

2011-02-09 Thread Daniel Kulp
I believe this was intended for dev@aries, not cxf. :-) Dan On Wednesday 09 February 2011 12:31:36 pm Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I would suggest the use of confluence as a real wiki. > Keep our web site the way it is, but the page Zoe is currently working > on imho could clearly fit in a real wi

Re: Use confluence wiki for ... wiki

2011-02-09 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Sorry for the nois, it was intended to be sent to d...@aries.apache.org On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 18:31, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I would suggest the use of confluence as a real wiki. > Keep our web site the way it is, but the page Zoe is currently working > on imho could clearly fit in a real wiki,

Use confluence wiki for ... wiki

2011-02-09 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I would suggest the use of confluence as a real wiki. Keep our web site the way it is, but the page Zoe is currently working on imho could clearly fit in a real wiki, as it's not project documentation ... Thoughts ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.