+1
Willem
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.6.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote
+1.
Willem
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.1.8 release. Over 43 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.1.9
*Note:* as announced earlier this will be the last 2.1.x release
+1
Christian
Am 20.01.2010 02:41, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.1.8 release. Over 43 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.1.9
*Note:* as announced earlier this will b
+1
Christian
Am 20.01.2010 02:44, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.6.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.o
Oh great thing Sergey,
thanks for that answer. I just tried and it works just fine. In fact,
documentation was either misleading or I misread. The documentation says
"This property has a limited value for JAXRS services as JAXB is supported by
default, the only supported value is 'aegis' and it
On Wed January 20 2010 7:11:32 am Benson Margulies wrote:
> We've noticed that the order in which some bits of WSDLs come out of
> CXF depends on which JRE is running -- a sure sign a hash iteration
> order dependency.
>
> Does anyone know off hand if this is CXF code as opposed to wsdl4j code?
I
Hi
It is possible. It has to work, you do not even has to enable it for JAXRS; for DOSGI-RI/JAX-RS it is a default databinding given
that the JAXRS spec requires the JAXB support OTB so I thought asking users to explictly add org.apache.cxf.rs.databinding=jaxb just
to enable JAXB would be too m
Hi list,
following the DOSGi reference [1] I see that it's not possible to use JAXB
under JAX-RS but with JAX-WS. Is that correct? And what is the reason for it?
Kind regards,
Daniel
[1] http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-reference.html
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signatur
+1
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 2:44 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.2.6.
>
> List of issues:
>
> https:
+1,
-- Ulhas
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.6.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseN
+1,
--ulhas
Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.1.8 release. Over 43 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.1.9
*Note:* as announced earlier this will be the last 2.1.x release
We've noticed that the order in which some bits of WSDLs come out of
CXF depends on which JRE is running -- a sure sign a hash iteration
order dependency.
Does anyone know off hand if this is CXF code as opposed to wsdl4j code?
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 20 January 2010 01:45
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.2.6
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to t
+1
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org]
Sent: 20 January 2010 01:41
To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.1.9
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to t
+1
David
2010/1/20 Daniel Kulp :
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.1.8 release. Over 43 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.1.9
>
> *Note:* as announced earlier this will be the last
+1
David
2010/1/20 Daniel Kulp :
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.2.6.
>
> List of issues:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/
+1
Cheers,
Eoghan
2010/1/20 Daniel Kulp
>
> This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
>
> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
> have been done compared to the 2.1.8 release. Over 43 JIRA issues
> are resolved for 2.1.9
>
> *Note:* as announced earlier this will be
+1
Cheers,
Eoghan
2010/1/20 Freeman Fang
> +1
>
> Freeman
>
> On 2010-1-20, at 上午9:44, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
>
>> This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
>>
>> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
>> have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issue
+1
Freeman
On 2010-1-20, at 上午9:44, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.6.
List of issues:
https://issues.apache.
+1
Freeman
On 2010-1-20, at 上午9:41, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.1.9
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.1.8 release. Over 43 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.1.9
*Note:* as announced earlier this will
+1
cheers, Sergey
On Jan 19, 2010, at 6:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
This is a vote to release CXF 2.2.6
Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that
have been done compared to the 2.2.5 release. Over 78 JIRA issues
are resolved for 2.2.6.
List of issues:
https://is
21 matches
Mail list logo