Hi Dan,
Long story short, I got this working yesterday.
This concept of Local Transport in CXF is very useful for custom transports.
I think there should be more documentation on how to use this.
I also think that Interceptors is another very useful thing for customizing,
more documentation wou
+1
- Original Message -
From: "Eoghan Glynn"
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 3:01 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0 (take 2)
Folks,
I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The main differences between this and the first take are:
- addition of a so
2009/5/7 Eoghan Glynn :
> 2009/5/7 Daniel Kulp :
>>
>> Eoghan,
>>
>> Could the version be passed into the xslt via an xslt param? That would
>> avoid needing to modify it as part of the builds and such.
>>
>> Dan
>
>
> Yeah, sure it could.
>
> The literal version in the xslt was just a quick'n'di
2009/5/7 Daniel Kulp :
>
> Eoghan,
>
> Could the version be passed into the xslt via an xslt param? That would
> avoid needing to modify it as part of the builds and such.
>
> Dan
Yeah, sure it could.
The literal version in the xslt was just a quick'n'dirty fix for a
minor issue in the OSGi co
+1
David
2009/5/7 Eoghan Glynn :
> Folks,
>
> I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>
> The main differences between this and the first take are:
>
> - addition of a sources distro
> - LICENSE file now contains references to licenses for 3rd party dependencies
> - remo
Eoghan,
Could the version be passed into the xslt via an xslt param? That would
avoid needing to modify it as part of the builds and such.
Dan
On Thu May 7 2009 10:04:10 am egl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: eglynn
> Date: Thu May 7 14:04:09 2009
> New Revision: 772651
>
> URL: http://svn.
Folks,
I'm calling a second vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
The main differences between this and the first take are:
- addition of a sources distro
- LICENSE file now contains references to licenses for 3rd party dependencies
- removal of extraneous NOTICEs
- addition of top-l
