Re: add SDO for CXF

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue March 31 2009 7:00:20 pm Yujian LIN wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > I am interested in the project "implement_SDO_databinding_for_CXF" > I wrote the proposal, hope some feed back before I submit it > ** > Best Regards, > > Yujian The Apache mail system strips off most attachments. Thus, your p

add SDO for CXF

2009-03-31 Thread Yujian LIN
Hello Daniel, I am interested in the project "implement_SDO_databinding_for_CXF" I wrote the proposal, hope some feed back before I submit it ** Best Regards, Yujian

Re: [gsoc] SOAP over JMS

2009-03-31 Thread rahul.soa
Hello Daniel, Thanks for your reply. No problem about the proposal on 'SOAP over JMS' as you probably know I am getting into ws-security support project for Apache Geronimo. And that project also has a big dependencies on CXF so will be discussing some stuff with you in future. Moreover, I will a

Re: wsdl2java -p option change

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue March 31 2009 2:08:23 pm Benson Margulies wrote: > I did not commit the move to 2.1.10, too many strange incompatibilities. Well, it's working with 2.1.9 as well. I THINK it was 2.1.6 that we had issues with. May have been earlier. Dan > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp

Re: wsdl2java -p option change

2009-03-31 Thread Benson Margulies
I did not commit the move to 2.1.10, too many strange incompatibilities. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > I just dug up my old tests and it looks like the problems with the -p stuff > is > fixed in JAXB 2.1.10. I'm not sure when it was fixed, but it definitely > looks OK

Re: GSoC Proposal:Implement the SOAP/JMS specification for CXF

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Tue March 31 2009 1:24:37 pm liucong wrote: > Hi, > > I have started to consider other ideas. If you (or any of the other students) are considering another option, the soap/tcp project is, in some ways, a bit easier than the soap/jms project. A few reasons: 1) The soap/tcp thing really is

Re: GSoC Proposal:Implement the SOAP/JMS specification for CXF

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Kulp
As Willem mentioned, there are a couple other students thinking about this project, but you are definitely the first (that I've seen) to start writing up a proposal and, more importantly, engaging the CXF community to help review the proposal. Thus, I'm quite OK with that. The proposal l

Re: GSoC Proposal:Implement the SOAP/JMS specification for CXF

2009-03-31 Thread liucong
Hi, I have started to consider other ideas. The project I attented is not public, so I can't give some links for it. Though I have read some code about axis2, axis, mule, r-osgi, cxf-dosgi, but I have not contributed some ideas to this project. I want to attend the GSoC, and get me involved into

Re: wsdl2java -p option change

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Kulp
I just dug up my old tests and it looks like the problems with the -p stuff is fixed in JAXB 2.1.10. I'm not sure when it was fixed, but it definitely looks OK with 2.1.10. Thus, I'm going to go ahead and remove the check for the -p issues for CXF 2.2.1. Dan On Tue March 31 2009 3:48:37 a

Re: GSoC Proposal:Implement the SOAP/JMS specification for CXF

2009-03-31 Thread Willem Jiang
Hi, Since there are more than 2 student choiced CXF-SOAP-JMS, do you consider to choice other ideas of CXF project ? Can you give us some reference of your projects or some link can show your coding ability? 最后能问一句你在北航那个实验室? :) Willem jason wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to take part in the

Re: wsdl2java -p option change

2009-03-31 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Mon March 30 2009 6:26:35 pm Rao, Sameer V wrote: > Since XJC already supports using single package name for multiple > schemas with different namespace by means of passing the -p parameter, > why should this feature be disabled? I believe (at least at one point), that this was one of the pa