RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.9

2008-10-11 Thread Emeka Kanu
+1 > Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2008 19:22:46 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > dev@cxf.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.9> > +1> > Please > include my last fix in the release> > Willem Jiang schrieb:> > -BEGIN PGP > SIGNED MESSAGE-> > Hash: SHA1> > > > This is a vote to rel

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.9

2008-10-11 Thread Christian Schneider
+1 Please include my last fix in the release Willem Jiang schrieb: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.9 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.9 release. Over 37 JIRA issues are

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.9

2008-10-11 Thread d . santosh
+1 On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 2:13 AM, Freeman Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > +1 > > Freeman > > > Willem Jiang wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.9 >> >> Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that >> have

Re: JMS 1.0.2 support......

2008-10-11 Thread Christian Schneider
Hi Dan, sounds reasonable to me. I have added the config element to address and set the default. Greetings Christian Daniel Kulp schrieb: Christian, The old JMS transport pretty much just used the JMS 1.0.2 API's so it worked with old versions of JMS providers and such. The new stuff