Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8

2008-07-23 Thread Jarek Gawor
+1 Jarek On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Kulp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.8 > > Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have > been done compared to the 2.0.8 release.

Re: how about we honor style sheet in wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Freeman Fang
Hi Glen, Actually I have same concern with you. This request is from a servicemix user but I'm not sure if it's reasonable for wsdl, so I post question here to get more feedback. Regards Freeman Glen Mazza wrote: Should WSDLs have stylesheets? After all, as they say, web services are for

Re: how about we honor style sheet in wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Glen Mazza
Should WSDLs have stylesheets? After all, as they say, web services are for computers what web browsers are for human beings--but computers don't care about how data looks, so the need for stylesheets is less clear. (Although I certainly understand that the intention of the stylesheet is for the

Re: https for wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Glen Mazza
dkulp wrote: > > We could extend it for this case to allow something like: > > name="https://my.server.com/webservices/services/MyService?wsdl";> > > Although I may be way off in what is being discussed here, I'm not sure if that will work, because the servlet container won't let you acc

Re: https for wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Glen Mazza
Benson Margulies-5 wrote: > > Fred's email caught my eye. How hard would this be? What's involved? > I'm not sure of the scope of what is being talked about here--Fred brought up multiple issues. If it is the case about being able to retrieve a WSDL from an https:// URL when running wsdl2java

Re: https for wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jul 23, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: Fred's email caught my eye. How hard would this be? What's involved? Depends on how you want to implement it. :-) If you want to reuse the existing http-conduit configuration so that the configuration can be shared between the wsdl retr

Re: how about we honor style sheet in wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jul 23, 2008, at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I think the problem is that when served from CXF, the PI is removed from the original WSDL. Does wsdl4j keep the PI?That's the first question. Actually, just looked in StaxUtils and it wouldn't write the PI: public static void w

Re: how about we honor style sheet in wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Benson Margulies
Oh! Is there a JIRA for this? It has to be a side-effect of patching the address, no? On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the problem is that when served from CXF, the PI is removed > from the original WSDL. > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Ben

Re: how about we honor style sheet in wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I think the problem is that when served from CXF, the PI is removed from the original WSDL. On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Benson Margulies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't follow exactly. > > If the URL in the PI were relative, then we could imagine serving it > up. But as an absolute URL,

https for wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Benson Margulies
Fred's email caught my eye. How hard would this be? What's involved?

Re: how about we honor style sheet in wsdl

2008-07-23 Thread Benson Margulies
I don't follow exactly. If the URL in the PI were relative, then we could imagine serving it up. But as an absolute URL, it's up to the user to configure the container to deliver it, no? On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:48 AM, Freeman Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > For the wsdl like > > h

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8

2008-07-23 Thread Ulhas Bhole
+1 -- Ulhas Daniel Kulp wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.8 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.8 release. Over 28 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.0.8. Most importa

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8

2008-07-23 Thread Eoghan Glynn
+1 Daniel Kulp wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.8 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.8 release. Over 28 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.0.8. Most importantly, thi

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8

2008-07-23 Thread Paibir, Ajay
+1 Ajay > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 July 2008 02:37 > To: CXF Dev > Subject: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8 > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.8 > > Once again, there have been a

RE: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8

2008-07-23 Thread Emeka Kanu
+1 -Original Message- From: Willem Jiang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 July 2008 08:15 To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8 +1 . Willem Daniel Kulp wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.8 > > Once

Re: [VOTE] Release CXF 2.0.8

2008-07-23 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 . Willem Daniel Kulp wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is a vote to release CXF 2.0.8 Once again, there have been a bunch of bug fixes and enhancements that have been done compared to the 2.0.8 release. Over 28 JIRA issues are resolved for 2.0.8. Most importan