Issuing compiling from the main branch using github

2023-02-03 Thread Haag, Scott M
I was wondering if anybody had any advice for me on the following error, I am trying to clean install from the head of the main branch in git. Below are my commands; this error start with commit d998331c1cfef48d792c78a8d3c1670498a8b925 The commands below work for the previous commit a97258b01d4

Re: Issuing compiling from the main branch using github [EXTERNAL]

2023-02-03 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Scott, Thanks for the report - especially the setup, failure message and commit details. Would you mind copying it into the GitHub issues area? https://github.com/apache/ctakes/issues I think that I know what happened ... The pom files for several modules used ${basedir} instead of the pr

Re: Issuing compiling from the main branch using github [EXTERNAL] [SUSPICIOUS]

2023-02-03 Thread Finan, Sean
I just checked in the revert on ctakes-ytex/scripts/data/build.xml Packaging works on my machine, but it had also worked for all previous tests so maybe there is still an issue. Sean From: Finan, Sean Sent: Friday, February 3, 2023 11:09 AM To: dev@ctakes.apach

Re: Issuing compiling from the main branch using github [EXTERNAL] [SUSPICIOUS] [SUSPICIOUS]

2023-02-03 Thread Finan, Sean
By the way, for all who are using "mvn install" and aren't interested in creating a binary installation: There is a new maven profile called "no-zips-build" in ctakes 5. When enabled it will skip the creation of src and binary tar.gz and .zip files during the package phase. This significantly

[GitHub] [ctakes] Haags opened a new issue, #8: Issue clean install using maven for ctakes-ytex

2023-02-03 Thread via GitHub
Haags opened a new issue, #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/ctakes/issues/8 I was wondering if anybody had any advice for me on the following error, I am trying to clean install from the head of the main branch in git. Below are my commands; this error start with commit d998331c1cfe

[GitHub] [ctakes] seanfinan commented on issue #8: Issue clean install using maven for ctakes-ytex

2023-02-03 Thread via GitHub
seanfinan commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/ctakes/issues/8#issuecomment-1416323145 Hi Scott, Thanks for the report - especially the setup, failure message and commit details. Would you mind copying it into the GitHub issues area? https://urldefense.com/v3/__htt

[GitHub] [ctakes] seanfinan commented on issue #8: Issue clean install using maven for ctakes-ytex

2023-02-03 Thread via GitHub
seanfinan commented on issue #8: URL: https://github.com/apache/ctakes/issues/8#issuecomment-1416323915 I just checked in the revert on ctakes-ytex/scripts/data/build.xml Packaging works on my machine, but it had also worked for all previous tests so reopen if this is still an issue. S

[GitHub] [ctakes] seanfinan closed issue #8: Issue clean install using maven for ctakes-ytex

2023-02-03 Thread via GitHub
seanfinan closed issue #8: Issue clean install using maven for ctakes-ytex URL: https://github.com/apache/ctakes/issues/8 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To uns

Crash course in cTakes

2023-02-03 Thread Rick Coleman
Hello everyone, Can anyone point me to an exhaustive set of documentation regarding cTakes? The main site feels like it was written by a marketing major, lots of flash and catchiness, but little in the way of detailed documentation.  Even the User Install Guide and the Developer Install guide

Re: Crash course in cTakes [EXTERNAL]

2023-02-03 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Rick, Thank you for the questions and for reminding us that the documentation is sparse, outdated and not very detailed. Everybody needs a prod now and then to get things done. I hope that we can get a solid README and Wiki going on GitHub, as well as an update to the primary website. It

Re: Crash course in cTakes [EXTERNAL]

2023-02-03 Thread Rick Coleman
Sean, Thanks for getting back to me in this.  I was afraid that was what the answer was going to be. I appreciate you taking the time to fill in some of the gaps.  If it's so dependent on Java 1.8, someone should probably remove the "or higher" on the download page. I look forward to gett