Hi Stuart,
That is strange. Both dictionaries validate the username in the same way, so
if it works for one it should work for the other. I am guessing that this
problem is repeatable, but I have to ask if you've tested the different
dictionaries on different machines or different locations,
Hi Britt,
The dictionary should be using ptb tokenization, but I obviously missed a rule
and separated the . from the following 2 in the dictionary.
I will double-check everything.
Sean
p.s. if you don’t mind my asking, are you looking into all connective tissue
disorders or just Shprintzen?
Thanks Sean.
The other part of the concern is if its reasonable/feasible to alter
tokenization rules for things like gene locations. I can work around this in a
few ways but if there are other examples of how this might come up in other
cases it could be worth looking at a blanket change. Sadly
Can you make sure you did everything documented here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CTAKES/YTEX+Installation
I can see from the stack trace that hibernate is not in the classpath (see
section 'Unzip YTEX Libraries')
Best,
VJ
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:41 AM, Oranit Dror wrote:
> T
Hi,
I think there is a regression in the way cTAKES discovers the subject status
("patient", "familiy_member", etc.) of an UmlsConcept. Using cTAKES 3.2.2 and
the AggregatePlaintextFastUMLSProcessor in the CVD:
1. "Patient's brother has a myocardial infarction."
"myocardial infarction" and "in
Tomasz,
Yes, please please feel free to open a Jira ticket for this. Also, Be sure to
include the version of the cTAKES and pipeline you're using.
It is possible that the new Subject Classifier isn't classifying this...
-Original Message-
From: Tomasz Oliwa [mailto:ol...@uchicago.edu]
Se
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CTAKES-369 is open now.
Thanks for looking into this. If there is something I could additionally test,
let me know.
