Question about CPE/ descriptor and xml file.

Hello everyone, I am a new user of cTakes and I would like to integrate it in my code to run it programmatically. I followed the example in the cTakes package but I have an error message regarding the descriptor: [...] 03 Jan 2015 13:39:33 INFO UmlsDictionaryLookupAnnotator - Using ctakes.

RE: Question about CPE/ descriptor and xml file.

Go through the error that you got, and look for a message like: Failed to initilize. Invalid UMLS License and Error: Invalid UMLS License. A UMLS License is required to use the UMLS dictionary lookup. Error: You may request one at: https://uts.nlm.nih.gov/license.html Please verify your UML

Re: Question about CPE/ descriptor and xml file.

Thank you for your quick answer, I am going to double check these points. On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Finan, Sean < sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote: > Go through the error that you got, and look for a message like: > > Failed to initilize. Invalid UMLS License > > and > > Error: Inv

Negex

Hi all - Does anyone know off the top of their head if the negex trigger rules included in the original 2009 python script were added to when it was implemented in ctakes? Thanks, John

RE: Negex

Yes, they were added in the rule-based implementation. You can still use it if you'd like. --Guergana -Original Message- From: Green, John [mailto:john.gr...@usuhs.edu] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:59 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Negex Hi all - Does anyone know off the to

Re: Negex

Thanks Ma'am for the input! So to clarify: ctakes added additional trigger words to the list published originally? (This is an unrelated question to the negex vs ml thread last month). Best, John — Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Green, John wrote: > Hi all - Does any

RE: Negex

I don't know. I'm comparing what I think is the 2009 negex trigger set https://code.google.com/p/negex/source/browse/trunk/GeneralNegEx.Java.v.1.2.05092009/negex_triggers.txt with the cTakes trigger set in org.apache.ctakes.core.fsm.machine.NegationFSM.java and it looks like the cTakes set is

Re: Negex

I think the original ctakes negation AE is in the spirit of Negex, but it is not Negex. AFAICT the ctakes negation AE * requires that triggers are single tokens * does not support conjuctions (e.g. however, nevertheless) or post-negation triggers (e.g. free, was ruled out) * is based on a FSM, whi

RE: Negex

> Adding triggers requires modifying a text file - much simpler than changing > code and compiling. +1 Thanks Vijay! -Original Message- From: vijay garla [mailto:vnga...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 3:13 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Negex I think the original