nal Message-
> From: Wu, Stephen T., Ph.D. [mailto:wu.step...@mayo.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:32 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org; samir chabou
> Subject: Re: sentence number in WordToken
>
> Hmm, we should probably have a process to vote up or down type system
>
d point,
>I did it also with selectCovering but as Richard mention I'll changed to
>indexCovering since it's faster.
>Samir
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "Chen, Pei"
>To: "dev@ctakes.apache.org" ; samir chabou
>
>Sent:
t: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:10:45 PM
Subject: RE: sentence number in WordToken
Samir,
I think Richard has a good point here. What is the use to require adding
sentenceNumber() to BaseToken in the TypeSystem?
If it's only temporary, It may be a good idea to do it programmatically wi
2013 11:59 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org; samir chabou
> Subject: Re: sentence number in WordToken
>
> Hi,
>
> if you do many selectCovering calls, you may be faster using indexCovering
> once and then using the lookup index it produces.
>
> IMHO type systems should n
Hi,
if you do many selectCovering calls, you may be faster using
indexCovering once and then using the lookup index it produces.
IMHO type systems should not contain information that can easily
be calculated at runtime (e.g. sentence number, token number, etc.).
Mind, I have no say here ;) Just
Hi Pei,
I though
this may be have some use …
Because I
need to know if two or more words tokens belong to the same sentence; and
since WordToken does not define the feature sentence number. I added it to the
TypeSystem. These are the steps:
1) I added the sentence number
features for the
