Re: empty preferredText [EXTERNAL]

2021-12-07 Thread Finan, Sean
Hear, hear! From: Peter Abramowitsch Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 1:17 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: empty preferredText [EXTERNAL] * External Email - Caution * "but I might revisit it on a snowy afternoon this winter. " >

Re: empty preferredText [EXTERNAL]

2021-12-07 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
t it on a snowy afternoon this winter. Of course, if > anybody out there in the dev world would like to take a first crack at it > ... > > Sean > ________ > From: Peter Abramowitsch > Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 12:34 PM > To: dev@ctake

Re: empty preferredText [EXTERNAL]

2021-12-07 Thread Finan, Sean
snowy afternoon this winter. Of course, if anybody out there in the dev world would like to take a first crack at it ... Sean From: Peter Abramowitsch Sent: Tuesday, December 7, 2021 12:34 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: empty preferredText [EXTERN

Re: empty preferredText [EXTERNAL]

2021-12-07 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
I think the issue is that preferred text in the dictionary is only populated by matches from the "dest" vocabularies and it uses *their* preferred text. If there's no match in any of them, then it should put the CUI's own preferred text entry in the dictionary, but it doesn't. I'm pretty sure It'

Re: empty preferredText [EXTERNAL]

2021-12-07 Thread Miller, Timothy
OK, I thought this might be what's happening. I did check my 2021 UMLS release and the cui does seem to have a preferred text but I think my container is using an older release. For what it's worth the CUI is: C0360554 and a sentence that reproduces the issue in CVD with the current release is: