As I said:
> Perhaps the default should be zipping the universe, but allowing the user to
> disable one or the other
-Original Message-
From: Pei Chen [mailto:chen...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 5:15 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Revert change to r.1768
I am not being
> defensive or aggressive about my code, I am simply offering a possible next
> step.
>
> Sean
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pei Chen [mailto:chen...@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 3:51 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subje
I am open to opinions on a future course of action. I am not being
defensive or aggressive about my code, I am simply offering a possible next
step.
Sean
-Original Message-
From: Pei Chen [mailto:chen...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 3:51 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject
ase.html
> >
> > We may want to move forward, not back. Thoughts?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Murali Minnah [mailto:mmin...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 10:28 AM
> > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> > Subject: Revert change to r.17
rg/maven-release/maven-release-plugin/examples/perform-release.html
>
> We may want to move forward, not back. Thoughts?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Murali Minnah [mailto:mmin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 10:28 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subje
Fair enough, I was starting to lean towards that same idea myself.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: James Masanz [mailto:masanz.ja...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 12:55 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Revert change to r.1768564
why don't we do that (right) afte
iginal Message-
> From: Murali Minnah [mailto:mmin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 10:28 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Revert change to r.1768564
>
> Hello fellow cTAKERs
>
> Can someone please help revert this change?
>
> r.1768564
> ctakes-di
10, 2017 10:28 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Revert change to r.1768564
Hello fellow cTAKERs
Can someone please help revert this change?
r.1768564
ctakes-distribution/pom.xml
"Separated build into 2 profiles: packageBinary and packageSource packageBinary
is enabled by default, packag
Thanks James. Hopefully soon.
Best,
Murali
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 11:04 AM, James Masanz
wrote:
> Hi Murali,
> I checked into trunk changes that undid what had been done in r1768564.
> Do you think we'll be able to have a release candidate by tomorrow so we
> can give the community time to tes
Hi Murali,
I checked into trunk changes that undid what had been done in r1768564.
Do you think we'll be able to have a release candidate by tomorrow so we
can give the community time to test it and announce the release on the 18th?
Thanks!
-- James
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Murali Minna
I'm working on it now
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Murali Minnah wrote:
> Hello fellow cTAKERs
>
> Can someone please help revert this change?
>
> r.1768564
> ctakes-distribution/pom.xml
> "Separated build into 2 profiles: packageBinary and packageSource
> packageBinary is enabled by defaul
Hello fellow cTAKERs
Can someone please help revert this change?
r.1768564
ctakes-distribution/pom.xml
"Separated build into 2 profiles: packageBinary and packageSource
packageBinary is enabled by default, packageSource is not"
This changed prevents source code from being distributed using the
12 matches
Mail list logo
