Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL]

2020-08-05 Thread Finan, Sean
rg Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] * External Email - Caution * Hi Sean, Many thanks for the detailed reply. We have implemented cTKES 4.0.0 as our NLP engine for quite a long time. We have already made many adjustments in the 4.0.0 code base based on our re

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL]

2020-08-05 Thread Sreejith Pk
ngStatusAnnotation as a negatable. > > I don't know if any of this is helpful, but I thought that I would throw > it out there. > > Sean > > From: Sreejith Pk > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 4:09 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-31 Thread Finan, Sean
> From: Tomasz Oliwa > Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:17 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] > [EXTERNAL] > > * External Email - Caution * > > > Sean, > > Since you mention a new rel

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-31 Thread Jeffrey Miller
2020 1:17 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] > [EXTERNAL] > > * External Email - Caution * > > > Sean, > > Since you mention a new release, is there any expected time for a new > stable cTAKES relea

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-29 Thread Finan, Sean
Hi Tomasz, As far as I know there aren't any upcoming releases planned. Sean From: Tomasz Oliwa Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 1:17 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] [EXT

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-29 Thread Tomasz Oliwa
AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] I don't think that anybody does. It is not in the release, not documented, not necessarily ready for widespread use, etc. Everything associated with types List and ListEntry is new. Hope

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-24 Thread Finan, Sean
sable. Sean From: Peter Abramowitsch Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 10:50 AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] [EXTERNAL] * External Email - Caution * Thanks Sean. I didn't know about that annotato

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-24 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
;t know if any of this is helpful, but I thought that I would throw > it out there. > > Sean > > From: Sreejith Pk > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 4:09 AM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [E

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL]

2020-07-24 Thread Finan, Sean
on't know if any of this is helpful, but I thought that I would throw it out there. Sean From: Sreejith Pk Sent: Friday, July 24, 2020 4:09 AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM [EXTERNAL] * External Email - Ca

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM

2020-07-24 Thread Sreejith Pk
Hi Peter, Thanks a lot for the reply. Let me elaborate more on the changes I have done so far. I have added KuRuleBasedClassifierAnnotator to the pipeline inorder to fetch Smoking related keywords from the document. I have modified KuRuleBasedClassifierAnnotator in such a way that it will iterate

Re: Clarification regarding NegationFSM

2020-07-23 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
Check and see if the identified annotation you get for "Smoking status: N" without your change is actually "Non Smoker" with polarity 1. Nonsmoker is a separate concept, from a Smoker with polarity -1. Instead of looking at range text, check the canonical text for the concept you have. Having said