an, Sean
> wrote:
>
> Great explanation,
> Thank you Tim!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 7:18 AM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Evaluate cTAKES perfomance [S
Great explanation,
Thank you Tim!
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 7:18 AM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Evaluate cTAKES perfomance [SUSPICIOUS]
To save you a little trouble, in ctakes
cleaned up as much.
Tim
From: Leander Melms
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 3:05 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Evaluate cTAKES perfomance
Thanks! I'll have a look at it and will try to give something back to the
community!
Leander
> On 17
h - basically
>> TextSpanWriter with the added output of CUIs.
>>
>> You can also have a look at EntityCollector of
>> org.apache.ctakes.core.pipeline. It has an annotation engine that keeps a
>> running list of "entities" for the whole run, doc ids, spans,
to:me...@students.uni-marburg.de]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 1:46 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Evaluate cTAKES perfomance
Hi Sean,
thank you (again) for your help and feedback! I'll give it a try! Seems like
the authors of the publication "Mayo clinical Text analysis and Knowle
as an annotation engine that keeps a
> running list of "entities" for the whole run, doc ids, spans, text and cuis.
>
> Sean
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Leander Melms [mailto:me...@students.uni-marburg.de]
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 1:09 PM
&
marburg.de]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 1:09 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Evaluate cTAKES perfomance
Sorry for writing again. I just have a quick question: My idea is to parse the
cTAKES output to a text file with a structure like this
DocName|Spans|CUI|CoveredText|ConceptType and d
Sorry for writing again. I just have a quick question: My idea is to parse the
cTAKES output to a text file with a structure like this
DocName|Spans|CUI|CoveredText|ConceptType and do the same with the cold
standart (from anafora).
Is this a correct way to do this?
I'm new to the subject and
