Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-05 Thread Finan, Sean
rking somewhere? Sean From: Peter Abramowitsch Sent: Wednesday, January 5, 2022 12:51 AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL] * External Email - Caution * Hi Tim, The performance boost was the frosting o

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-04 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
s of magnitudes faster on such onerous docs? In my tests, yes. > > > Going through my delegating example above, the end delegate is the same. > > Hence the processing is the same and repeatable. In my tests on both small > > and gargantuan documents the windowed version and th

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-04 Thread Miller, Timothy
ments the windowed version and the original version produced the same output. Sean From: Peter Abramowitsch < <mailto:pabramowit...@gmail.com> pabramowit...@gmail.com > Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:39 AM To: <mailto:dev@ctakes.apache.org> dev@ctakes.apache.org

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-04 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
example above, the end delegate is the same. > Hence the processing is the same and repeatable. In my tests on both small > and gargantuan documents the windowed version and the original version > produced the same output. > > Sean > > > > > > > From: Peter Abramowitsch >

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-04 Thread Finan, Sean
the windowed version and the original version produced the same output. Sean From: Peter Abramowitsch Sent: Tuesday, January 4, 2022 11:39 AM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL] * External

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-04 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
sexy, but it gets the job done. > > Sean > > > ________________ > From: Peter Abramowitsch > Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 10:23 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL] > > * Externa

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-04 Thread Finan, Sean
HISTORY_OF_PRESENT ) ); } } It requires a stroll through the monstrous cas array and it certainly isn't sexy, but it gets the job done. Sean From: Peter Abramowitsch Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 10:23 PM To: dev@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Re: Per

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-03 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
___ > From: Peter Abramowitsch > Sent: Monday, January 3, 2022 5:03 PM > To: dev@ctakes.apache.org > Subject: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL] > > * External Email - Caution * > > > Hi All > > I've noticed that the HistoryCleartkAnalysisEn

Re: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL]

2022-01-03 Thread Finan, Sean
@ctakes.apache.org Subject: Performance of the cleartk history module [EXTERNAL] * External Email - Caution * Hi All I've noticed that the HistoryCleartkAnalysisEngine misses many common forms of subject history including the obvious "h/o" prefix.Looking into the distribution, ther

Performance of the cleartk history module

2022-01-03 Thread Peter Abramowitsch
Hi All I've noticed that the HistoryCleartkAnalysisEngine misses many common forms of subject history including the obvious "h/o" prefix.Looking into the distribution, there's a model.jar and what appears to be a weights file containing trigger words: resources/org/apache/ctakes/assertion/mod