l Message-
> From: vijay garla [mailto:vnga...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 3:13 PM
> To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Negex
> I think the original ctakes negation AE is in the spirit of Negex, but it is
> not Negex. AFAICT the ctakes negation AE
>
> Adding triggers requires modifying a text file - much simpler than changing
> code and compiling.
+1
Thanks Vijay!
-Original Message-
From: vijay garla [mailto:vnga...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 3:13 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: Negex
I thi
I think the original ctakes negation AE is in the spirit of Negex, but it
is not Negex. AFAICT the ctakes negation AE
* requires that triggers are single tokens
* does not support conjuctions (e.g. however, nevertheless) or
post-negation triggers (e.g. free, was ruled out)
* is based on a FSM
I don't know. I'm comparing what I think is the 2009 negex trigger set
https://code.google.com/p/negex/source/browse/trunk/GeneralNegEx.Java.v.1.2.05092009/negex_triggers.txt
with the cTakes trigger set in
org.apache.ctakes.core.fsm.machine.NegationFSM.java and it looks like the
cTa
Thanks Ma'am for the input!
So to clarify: ctakes added additional trigger words to the list published
originally? (This is an unrelated question to the negex vs ml thread last
month).
Best,
John
—
Sent from Mailbox
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Green, John wrote:
> Hi al
Yes, they were added in the rule-based implementation. You can still use it if
you'd like.
--Guergana
-Original Message-
From: Green, John [mailto:john.gr...@usuhs.edu]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 12:59 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Negex
Hi all - Does anyone know of
Hi all - Does anyone know off the top of their head if the negex trigger
rules included in the original 2009 python script were added to when it was
implemented in ctakes?
Thanks,
John
