+1 false ... I think
I just wonder what side effects there might be to tweaking LVG
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Finan, Sean <
sean.fi...@childrens.harvard.edu> wrote:
> +1 false
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
> Sent: Fr
+1 false
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Timothy [mailto:timothy.mil...@childrens.harvard.edu]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 2:54 PM
To: dev@ctakes.apache.org
Subject: Re: lvg entries
Thanks for tracking that down Andy.
I am making a pass at UimaFit-izing the configuration parameters fo
Thanks for tracking that down Andy.
I am making a pass at UimaFit-izing the configuration parameters for all
the annotators in the default pipeline, before I create the static
factory methods like we recently discussed. Should I go ahead and change
this to make default behavior be false?
Tim
On
You are right, I was thinking of the field called canonicalForm.
normlizedForm is set by ExtractionPrepAnnotator.java - but if I remember right,
that's at the end of the pipelines that it's included in. And it's set to
either the canonicalForm (if there is one) or the coveredText
Not sure what
Hmm... I don't see normalizedForm filled in. I see LVG filling in
canonicalForm, is it possible that's what you're thinking of? (Not that
I know what the difference is or is supposed to be, just going off what
I see in my xmis.)
Tim
On 04/17/2014 06:23 PM, Masanz, James J. wrote:
> The normalize
