Compiling snappy under Windows

I'm trying to compile up CouchDB 2.0 on Windows, using Joan Touzet's PowerShell script. This used to work, but the 1.1.3 Snappy update in October broke Windows compatibility, as it uses the ssize_t type, which MS C++ does not understand. The original google/snappy repository code deals with this i

Re: Compiling snappy under Windows

idn't have a chance to do that as I couldn't check > the result. > > However, I don't see any ssize_t related references. May be this won't > work, but worth to try. > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Nick North wrote: > > I&

Re: Compiling snappy under Windows

hdb.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:15:25 PM > > Subject: Re: Compiling snappy under Windows > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick North > > wrote: > > > I'm not exactly sure what you are proposing here. Are you saying we > > >

Re: Datazenit OpenSource License for CouchDB commiters / contributors

On a similar topic, a quick reminder that JetBrains tools are available free to Apache contributors. These include development tools for many languages, team collaboration systems, and ReSharper, the invaluable tool for Windows .NET developers. I just renewed my ReSharper licence, so a big thank yo

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

Hi Joan. This sounds like an improvement on my last Windows build attempt, which still had a couple of eunit failures outside the os_process area. I'll attempt to reproduce your results today, and report back. Nick On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 00:34 Joan Touzet wrote: > Replying to my own email: dev/

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

sites to get them to build under the modern Windows b uild system. > > > > Parenthetically, it _is_ possible to use binary installs for the > prerequisites (OpenSSL, libcurl, Erlang, SM 1.8.5), but Dave, Nick North > and I have evolved the glazier system over a number of years and it&

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

Sorry - I meant a single node cluster in that last message. And I meant to sign my name correctly. Nick On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 at 16:56 Nick North wrote: > I'm trying these tests now, and find that there are still a lot of JS > failures with a single cluster. Many of them look s

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

measure to produce the logs: > > for t in test/javascript/tests/*.js; do rm -rf dev/lib; dev/run -n 1 -q > --with-admin-party-please test/javascript/run $t 2>&1 | tee -a jstest2.log; > done > > Maybe it makes sense for you to start w/ something similar to produce some

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

some more > fixes > > and brings even more stability. In the meantime, deleting dev/lib is > indeed > > the best way to produce reliable results. So is switching between > > auth-tests-wip and master. But there's progress => it might all end up > > nicely on master. &

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

atch for that on > Windows and looking back I'm not seeing anything from after 2013 that > looks related (in davisp/jiffy). Looking at the apache/jiffy repo we > use merges so I'd think it'd be unlikely to have been overwritten but > I guess its always possible. > > Pau

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

ck On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 18:00 Nick North wrote: > Maybe I did something stupid with the PR. If I can get to a PC this > evening I'll take a look. > > Nick > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:41, Paul Davis > wrote: > >> That Jiffy error does seem like a conversion issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.0.0-rc.1

Windows 10, using the Windows installer. MD5 OK. Installed successfully, Fauxton working, setup in single node mode, created test database and a few docs. All good. A few non-blocking incidents: - Windows did not trust the installer, which might put cautious users off. - It ignored my at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.0.0-rc.1

Thanks Joan, Trying Windows installation on another machine shows that the trust problem is down to Windows Smartscreen, and this StackOverflow question suggests there's not

Re: [PLANNING] CouchDB 2.1

Hi Joan, Having done some work with the Windows build in the past, I'm happy to try to help with automating it. If you think there's anything I can do, maybe we could have a separate discussion on the steps needed to make it better. Nick > On 16 Dec 2016, at 19:20, Joan Touzet wrote: > > The

Re: [Lazy Consensus] Move from JIRA to GitHub Issues

+1 Nick > On 18 May 2017, at 07:01, Elisiano Petrini wrote: > > +1 👍🍻 > > Best Regards, > Elisiano Petrini > >> On May 17, 2017, at 9:38 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Hi everyone. >> >> As most of you know, a few months ago we moved many of our primary >> repositories from primary Apache

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

+1. Having put all the effort in to to get to a clean test suite, it would be a great shame to let it slip. The effort to remain clean is much less than the effort to get to that state in the first place: failing tests are easier to fix when they first occur and everything is fresh in the author's

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

This is pretty much the set of restrictions we have on the master branch in my organisation, and it works well. We also require PR reviews before merging, but anyone in the team can do the review, including the PR author. This means the author has to make a conscious decision on whether the changes

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

hatch" that we need. > > -Joan > > - Original Message - > From: "Nick North" > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" > Sent: Friday, 18 August, 2017 9:48:40 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that caus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

FRA ticket to have these settings changed on our primary repos > where Travis CI is enabled: > > couchdb > couchdb-fauxton > couchdb-documentation > couchdb-nano > couchdb-docker > > I will be explicitly leaving out couchdb-pkg, since CI doesn't (yet) > make sens

Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.3

Thanks as always Dave. +1 for R15B03 on Windows 2008 R2 SP1. There was one odd bit of behaviour: running Verify Installation hung first time, but was fine after stopping and restarting the service, and has been fine since. Nick On 1 April 2013 22:17, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > The Easter Bunny

Re: Windows Binaries, redux 1.2.2 and 1.3.0

R15B03 is working very nicely on Windows 7 Enterprise, SP1, 64-bit. Upgraded from 1.2.0, pointed it at the existing databases and it picked up full-mesh replication where the previous installation left off, without missing a beat. Beautiful. I'll leave it a few hours to settle in and then try a Wi

Re: Windows Binaries, redux 1.2.2 and 1.3.0

Oops - completely forgot to mention that. It was 1.3.0. On 5 April 2013 09:10, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > Thanks Nick. > > Was this the 1.2.2 or the 1.3.3 bundle then? > > > On 5 April 2013 10:06, Nick North wrote: > > > R15B03 is working very nicely on Window

Re: Windows Binaries, redux 1.2.2 and 1.3.0

1.3.0 R15B03 is also working on Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1. Nick On 5 April 2013 09:44, Nick North wrote: > Oops - completely forgot to mention that. It was 1.3.0. > > > On 5 April 2013 09:10, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >> Thanks Nick. >> >> Was this t

Re: [RELEASE][REQUEST] Binaries for 1.3.1-rc.2

T hanks Dave - fully relaxed here on Win7 Ultimate 64 bit. Nick On 18 June 2013 12:45, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 14 June 2013 15:30, Noah Slater wrote: > > Cool. Thanks. I am on vacation until Tues. Is anyone else able to prepare > > Win binaries? > > Done! > > https://dist.apache.org/repo

Re: [1.4] windows builds -- join the fun**

I'm interested. All my work is Windows-based so I'm keen to extend the Windows support community for CouchDb. My timezone is GMT, and preferred communication mechanism is email as it's not easy to guarantee times when I'll be available for skype/irc/etc. Recorded walkthroughs might also be interes

Re: [RESULT] (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.2)

In case it's useful: I've managed to build a working Win32 1.5.0 RC2 CouchDb binary using Erlang R14B04, with Dave's help. I'm going to have a go with the later Erlang releases, but have to get them built on Windows first so it may take a little while. Nick On 14 October 2013 21:13, Dirkjan Ocht

Re: [RESULT] (Was: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.2)

Ah yes - it's there in my Windows build as well. Hadn't tried that particular link. Dave - do you still want my build put somewhere public, as we now seem to be in the same state? The only space I have that can take something that size is GitHub, and I have an aesthetic dislike of large binaries i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3

+1 Windows 8, Erlang 14B04. I'll try building an Erlang 16 Windows release next... After Windows installation, the View Readme tickbox doesn't work properly: it throws up a command prompt, wich then disappears, but no README file. Not a showstopper though. On 20 October 2013 16:15, Alexander Sh

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3

+1 for Windows 8, Erlang R16B02. Nick On 20 October 2013 16:34, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > There are some issues with the LICENSE and NOTICE fine, but we are > > compliant from a legal perspective now, so this is till a non-blocking > bug

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.0-rc.3

Yet another Windows build, with another Erlang version: +1 Windows 8, Erlang R15B03-1 On 20 October 2013 19:45, Andy Wenk wrote: > Noah, here is the output of my make distcheck > > https://gist.github.com/andywenk/7073586 > > > > > On 20 October 2013 18:29, Nick No

Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.5.0-rc.3

Yes please - go for it. On 29 October 2013 21:43, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 28. Oktober 2013 at 12:52:25, Dirkjan Ochtman (d...@apache.org) wrote: > > > >Dear community, > > > >This is a request to prepare binaries for the 1.5.0-rc.3 release. > > > >Please follow the release procedure: > > >

Re: Query about your database (Couchdb)

These questions are best addressed to the CouchDb user list, so I've copied this answer there in case anyone else has a similar question. The things you want to do are all possible. CouchDb can run on any version of Windows, and there are cloud-based versions if you want your data in the cloud. An

Why does CouchDb need attachment length?

I'm working with CouchDb documents with multiple attachments, submitted using MIME multipart/related requests. In this case the document JSON has to have an "_attachments" property specifying each attachment's name, content type and length as described here

Re: Why does CouchDb need attachment length?

lso a chunked response, and we haven't > done that because the replicator could always form a non-chunked > request since it already knows the sizes. > > B. > > >> On 16 November 2013 18:11, Nick North wrote: >> I'm working with CouchDb documents with m

Re: Why does CouchDb need attachment length?

on wrote: > > Ah, no. Http requires either content length or a chunked encoding. We could > certainly enhance this. My point was that this endpoint was built for the > replicator. >> On 16 Nov 2013 18:54, "Nick North" wrote: >> >> Thanks for the quick

Re: Why does CouchDb need attachment length?

t; replicator. >> On 16 Nov 2013 18:54, "Nick North" wrote: >> >> Thanks for the quick reply. I see what you're saying, though it still >> seems to me that CouchDb could accept incoming non-chunked requests where >> individual attachments do not have th

Re: Why does CouchDb need attachment length?

hints in the Apache HTTP client that it may chunk requests even if you ask it not to, so the ability to accept chunked requests seems useful for CouchDb. Nick On 19 November 2013 01:45, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 16 Nov 2013, at 13:31 , Nick North wrote: > > > One more though

Improving MIME attachment processing in CouchDb

Following some earlier email discussions, I'm interested in contributing to CouchDb to improve handling of MIME attachments, and have some questions about the philosophy of the current code, to make sure that my changes are in the right spirit. Specifically the things I'd like to improve are:

Re: Improving MIME attachment processing in CouchDb

#x27;s get a branch or patch up for that > ASAP. > > Here's a good place to discuss, but for proposed specific changes a JIRA > ticket is likely better. > > A+ > Dave > > > > > On 2 December 2013 17:15, Nick North wrote: > > > Following some earlier

Chunked input for multipart/related requests

As mentioned the other day, I'm hoping to add CouchDb support for chunked HTTP requests that contain a document and attachments as a single multipart/related MIME request, and I'm hoping the group can advise me on the best coding direction. Apologies in advance for the length and detail of the emai

Re: Chunked input for multipart/related requests

ew before it can go in. One thing to note is that the > > replicator will verify the md5 of attachments as they're transferred, > > if that helps with your testing. > > > > B. > > > > > > On 4 December 2013 10:06, Nick North wrote: > >> As mentioned

Re: Chunked input for multipart/related requests

ion so I'm trying out a patched installation on the current hot topic: replication of the NPM registry. Nick On 4 December 2013 10:06, Nick North wrote: > As mentioned the other day, I'm hoping to add CouchDb support for chunked > HTTP requests that contain a document a

Re: [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1946) Trying to replicate NPM grinds to a halt after 40GB

When I tried replicating the NPM registry on Windows it bluescreened the machine when the Erlang process reached about 1GB. On the plus side, once the machine was rebooted, replication continued past 40GB, though it did begin to slow down at that point. I don't really want the registry, so stopped

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Nick North elected as CouchDB committer

ve Cottlehuber > wrote: > > Dear community, > > > > There's nothing like starting off the New Year with a New Committer!! > > > > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee > > has elected Nick North as a CouchDB committer. &g

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Nick North elected as CouchDB committer

Yes - I've been working my way through that, and it's extremely useful. There are some procedural things I don't have my head around at the moment, but I hope they will become clear as time goes on. Nick On 2 January 2014 08:29, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 201

Committer questions

After reading Andy Wenk's really helpful Committer First Stepsguide, I feel pretty well informed on submitting code CouchDb code, but I have just a few questions on commit etiquette (commitiquette?). I'm sure most of these are very obvious to m

Re: Committer questions

Many thanks Andy, and I'll definitely update the wiki once any other answers are in, Nick On 19 January 2014 17:12, Andy Wenk wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On 19 January 2014 14:57, Nick North wrote: > > > After reading Andy Wenk's really helpful Committer First >

Re: Committer questions

an wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Nick North wrote: > > First I'm wondering about when it's OK to push work to the Apache > > repository. If you put out a non-controversial GitHub pull request, and > > there are no negative comments after a reasonable time

Re: we need more reviews

On 20 January 2014 12:26, Dale Harvey wrote: > I fully agree, its something I mentioned at the couchdb conf in vancouver, > a review first system encourages contributions and has multiple benefits > > * At least 2 people look at the code, less likely to push silly mistakes > * Can codify and pr

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1

After some help from @dch following a brain failure during Windows build: sha, md5, sig: OK Windows 8.1 EN x64, with Erlang R14B04, R15B03-1, R16B02 Verify install OK for all three builds. Futon tests all OK except for show_documents, which fails on all three. But then it also fails on my 1.5.0 b

Re: Top posting in threads on the list's

On 23 January 2014 08:16, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: > > +1. Top posting is the worst. > > In case you're being sarcastic (which seems likely), perhaps that is > not the most productive response to a fairly low-key, open email. If > you disagree

Re: Marketing suggestion

I'd be in favour of keeping the number of lists small until it becomes clear that some topic needs to spin off into its own list. While the volume of marketing emails is low, it's not hard for devs who aren't that interested in marketing to ignore them, just as those who aren't interested in spe

Re: [NOTICE] Create marketing@ lis (Was: Re: Marketing suggestion)

I'm probably going to regret jumping into this, especially as I'm modifying my earlier view a bit, but how about getting some objectivity by basing a decision on whether to go ahead on the record of the other spin-off lists that have already been created? I have no idea how much traffic they hav

Re: [NOTICE] Create marketing@ lis (Was: Re: Marketing suggestion)

PS I don't want to be seen as filibustering here so, if people consider this to be a waste of time, I'm +1 on creating the list if the people who want to do the work want it. (Even though it's not my own inclination.) Nick > On 4 Feb 2014, at 17:30, Nick North wrote: >

Re: Couchbase trademark issues

As a fairly new CouchDb user, I have been confused about the relationship between CouchDb and Couchbase. For some while I was unsure whether the Couchbase site might have a more recent version of CouchDb than the CouchDb site did, especially as it talked about a forthcoming version 2, while CouchDb

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries, round 3

+1 Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 Windows 8 Consumer Preview x64 ( on VMWare Player) Firefox 11.0 Signature: is there a missing .asc file? I didn't see the signature file, but am probably missing something obvious. Md5 & sha OK. No malware detected. End-user verification OK. Futon tests passed on Win7

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries, round 3

+1 Windows 2008 R2 Standard (on VMWare) Firefox 11 signature OK md5 & sha OK No malware detected End-user verification OK Futon tests all passed Windows 2008 succeeded on all tests first time - that's the first Windows OS I've seen pass on everything. I also found the .asc file this time, and the

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries, round 3

+1 Windows Vista Business SP2 x64 MD5 and sha ok signature ok No Malware, viruses or other baddies. Firefox 11 Install verification ok Test suite complete success. On 25 March 2012 18:49, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to call a vote on the following Windows binaries based on

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries, round 3

n 25 March 2012 22:35, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 25 March 2012 21:28, Nick North wrote: > > +1 > > Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 > > Windows 8 Consumer Preview x64 ( on VMWare Player) > > Firefox 11.0 > > Signature: is there a missing .asc file? I didn't see

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries, round 3

refox. So now I'm a more positive +1, though just a little peeved that it's not possible to track down the problems. Nick On 25 March 2012 22:35, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 25 March 2012 21:28, Nick North wrote: > > +1 > > Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 > > Window

Re: Proposed CouchDB 1.2.0 Windows Binaries

+1 (not a vote) Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 Firefox 11 Signature OK md5 and sha OK No malware detected End-user verification OK Futon tests passed. (replicator_db failed as usual, but worked when I tried to debug) Windows 8 Consumer Preview x64 Firefox 11 Signature OK md5 and sha OK No malware det

Re: Proposed CouchDB 1.2.0 Windows Binaries

Windows 2008 R2 Standard x64 SP1 (on VMWare) Firefox 11 Signature OK md5 and sha OK No malware detected End-user verification OK Futon tests passed. Tested with R15B. On 31 March 2012 09:04, Nick North wrote: > +1 (not a vote) > > Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1 > Firefox 11 > Signatu

Replicated database size

s that it's to do with file compression on Windows Server but that is a guess, so I'm intending to do some experimentation with the other file compression options. I'd be grateful for any thoughts, as I'm planning out disk requirements for a system with ten times the capacity of the current one, and would very much like to be do that with some certainty about file sizes. Thanks in advance for any help, Nick North

Re: Hierarchical comments Hacker News style

I may be misunderstanding the problem, but would it work if you represent each comment by a list of its score and its id? Say comments 1, 2, 3, 4 have scores 40, 30, 20, 10 respectively, then the documents would become: { _id: 1, path: [[40,"1"]] }, { _id: 2, path: [[40,"1"], [30,"2"]] },

Re: Hierarchical comments Hacker News style

ean that I > would have to update more than 50 documents each time a user clicks on > the "upvote" button - not to mention the conflicts. > > Isn't there a better way? > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Nick North wrote: > > I may be misunderstanding the proble

Re: Replicated database size

in several ways, but didn't, so thank you. Nick On 15 May 2012 13:55, Nick North wrote: > I'm curious about the size of replicated CouchDb databases in comparison > to each other. I have four databases, each with pull replications from the > other three, but they report quit

Re: Replicated database size

16 May 2012 16:49, Nick North wrote: > > > Following up on my own email, this seems to be an issue with snappy on > > Windows Server 2008. When I changed the file_compression setting to > > deflate_6, the "large" databases went down from 7GB to 1GB after > > c

Re: Replicated database size

10.0.40219.325 and the tests failed in the same way. Nick On 16 May 2012 22:58, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 16 May 2012 20:37, Nick North wrote: > > > Thanks for replying - that test does show up a problem. It works fine on > my > > Win7 machine but, on Windows Server, says: >

Re: Replicated database size

this the R15B or the R14B04 build? Presumably > running as a service, right? > > On 17 May 2012 10:08, Nick North wrote: > > > Looking at erl.exe with procexp shows that both Win7 and Server 2008 are > > using 10.0.40219.325. Installing your vcredist version asked if I want

Re: Replicated database size

Good luck, and many thanks for looking into this. For your sake, I wish it had been a unique quirk on my setup. Nick On 22 May 2012 11:26, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 17 May 2012 12:07, Nick North wrote: > > > I'm getting this behaviour on 2008R2 and plain old 2008, and all

Re: Replicated database size

fixing the problem. Nick On 23 May 2012 00:01, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 22 May 2012 12:26, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > > On 17 May 2012 12:07, Nick North wrote: > > > >> I'm getting this behaviour on 2008R2 and plain old 2008, and all my > >>

Process for code submissions?

eone can help or guide me, or give an outline of how things operate in this area, I'd be really grateful. Many thanks, Nick North

Re: Process for code submissions?

Many thanks for the reply. I will sort those things out and resubmit. Nick On 5 Aug 2012, at 16:44, Robert Newson wrote: > Heh, and update the changes and news file so it mentions the new feature. :) > > Sent from my iPad > > On 5 Aug 2012, at 16:05, Nick North wrote: >

Re: Process for code submissions?

> it if you do two things. 1) consistent use of utc_id_suffix instead of > id_suffix in config 2) add your name to the THANKS file. > > B. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 5 Aug 2012, at 16:05, Nick North wrote: > > > I'm wondering if there is any process for dealing w

Re: Process for code submissions?

ty is called > utc_id_suffix > > We're only partially integrated with github pull requests, so you will > need to close the PR yourself once you're satisfied that I've incorporated > your work correctly. > > B. > > On 6 Aug 2012, at 09:51, Nick North wrote: >

Re: Process for code submissions?

itted or get a decision as to why not. > > > > I'm not sure what the "formal" process for all this is, I imagine the > Apache site has some docs on it, but I do know committers are obligated to > help build community, shepherd contributions, etc.. so I definite

Re: Unauthorized to access or create database--replication

ation code in the CouchRequest.cs file to get a template to work from. Nick North On 9 August 2012 16:38, Steven Kitterman wrote: > Hi guys. > > I am trying to replicate a database using .NET classes (httpWebRequest) > instead > of > curl. Unfortunately, the cURL works, b

Re: [REQUEST] Windows Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.1

It so happens that I have a few Windows 2008 R2 servers around. I'll get right on to the testing... Nick On 11 March 2013 14:42, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > Windows Binaries are up for testing at > http://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/ I've tested these on 64-bit > windows 8 enterprise and windows

Re: [REQUEST] Windows Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.1

Working on Windows 7 Ultimate. Server 2008 is giving a stream of errors at the moment - I will try on another one in case the problem is machine-specific. Nick On 11 March 2013 16:18, Nick North wrote: > It so happens that I have a few Windows 2008 R2 servers around. I'll get >

Re: [REQUEST] Windows Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.1

I'm stuck with Win Server 2008 R2. Attempts to Verify Installation give the errors in this attached log Nick On 11 March 2013 17:30, Nick North wrote: > Working on Windows 7 Ultimate. Server 2008 is giving a stream of errors at > the moment - I will try on another one in case the

Re: [REQUEST] Windows Binaries for 1.3.0-rc.1

Sorry for the delay in posting a gist for the Win Server 2008 problem - I've been in Citrix/VM/Remote Desktop hell. There is now a gist at https://gist.github.com/NorthNick/5141374. Nick On 11 March 2013 20:53, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On Mar 11, 2013, at 21:50 , Nick North wrote

Re: [DISCUSS] VS Code dev container?

I don't follow CouchDB much now, but I do use VS Code all the time, and have to bring new users on board with it. Docker and dev containers are very nice technologies for reducing VS Code start-up costs to almost zero, so this seems like a great plan, and I'd be in favour of anything that reduces f

Time-ordered document ids including the database identity

ould point me to the discussions so that I can understand the issues. Many thanks, Nick North

Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0

I use CouchDb only on Windows and, while an official Windows binary would be nice, I've never had any problem installing and updating from the ones in https://github.com/dch/couchdb/downloads, so it doesn't bother me much. Nick North On 11 January 2012 14:37, Kevin R. Coombes wrote:

Re: RFC: Releasing 1.2.0

s release? I'm happy >>> putting this off, and doing it with 1.3. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Dave Cottlehuber >>> wrote: >>> >>> On 11 January 2012 16:01, Nick North wrote: >>>> >>>>> I use CouchDb

CouchDb 1.2.0 Windows binaries issues

d5fbfc399a84bc88a1","value":666}' However, the behaviour does vary enough that I only consider the foo666 error to be a properly reportable issue. Do other people get these errors, or are they peculiar to my setup? In particular the replicator_db test is very odd in its lack of consistency. Thanks, Nick North PS Tests were run using Firefox 10.0.

CouchDb 1.2.0 Windows binaries issues

d5fbfc399a84bc88a1","value":666}' However, the behaviour does vary enough that I only consider the foo666 error to be a properly reportable issue. Do other people get these errors, or are they peculiar to my setup? In particular the replicator_db test is very odd in its lack of consistency. Thanks, Nick North PS Tests were run using Firefox 10.0.

Re: CouchDb 1.2.0 Windows binaries issues

Apologies to everyone: I sent the same message today as I sent a couple of days ago. What I meant to say today was that I have now also tested on Windows Server 2008 R2 and the Futon tests are all behaving fine there, but they have to be nursed through a little. That makes me think that the previou

Re: CouchDb 1.2.0 Windows binaries issues

> On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Nick North wrote: > > > Apologies to everyone: I sent the same message today as I sent a couple > of > > days ago. What I meant to say today was that I have now also tested on > > Windows Server 2008 R2 and the Futon tests are all behavin

Order of document ids vs order of _changes ids

I have a question about the order in which documents are committed to the database, which I hope a knowledgeable dev can help me out with. The question is (I think): if I create documents, using CouchDb-assigned document ids, will they appear in the _changes feed in the order that the ids were ass

Re: Order of document ids vs order of _changes ids

undary > greater than a single document update. > > B. > > On 7 February 2012 16:03, Nick North wrote: > > I have a question about the order in which documents are committed to the > > database, which I hope a knowledgeable dev can help me out with. > > > > The

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries

Using R15B: +1 Windows7 x64 Firefox 10.0.2 signature OK md5 & sha OK No malware End-user verification OK Futon tests failed All passed except replicator_db, which fails in various ways both locally and over the network, often with: Assertion failed: expected 'null', got '{"_id":"foo666","_rev":"1-8

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries

Win8 with R15B much like Win7: +1 Windows8 Developer Preview x64 (on VMWare) Firefox 10.0.2 signature OK md5 & sha OK No malware End-user verification OK Futon tests failed All passed except replicator_db, which fails in various ways both locally and over the network, often with: Assertion failed:

Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries

If there are any proposed patches to replicator_db timing I'd be happy to try them out, as I haven't yet managed to get this test to work at all in Win7 or Win8 with the latest build. The failures are not always identical: the number of "copy === null" failures varies, and I've occasionally had two

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Klaus Trainer elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Klaus! Nick On 18 February 2014 16:26, Andy Wenk wrote: > hey awesome :) Welcome to the club ! > > > On 18 February 2014 17:25, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > > Congratulations, Klaus! And welcome (: > > -- > > ,,,^..^,,, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >

Re: [GitHub] couchdb pull request: Add polyfill for IE8 Array.indexOf

I also initially took the view that CouchDb should not have to support IE8, as Microsoft won't. But searching around shows that Windows 7 initially came with IE8, which puts it under the same support cycle as Windows 7, meaning there are years of pain yet to suffer. Nick On 19 February 2014 10:3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Benjamin Young elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Benjamin! Nick On 25 February 2014 09:53, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > Dear community, > > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has > elected Benjamin Young as a CouchDB committer. > > Apache ID: bigbluehat > > IRC nick: bigbluehat > > Twi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1

Not at my PC just now so can't check the exact branch name that speeds up attachment parsing, but I think it's 1953. It does seem to make some difference to that test (though it's not a fix), and is in master but I wasn't sure if I should merge it to 1.6, so it is not currently there. Nick > O

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting

The great thing about being the only person at the meeting is that you get to assign all the actions :-) I'm not around this evening, but will do my action tomorrow if that's OK. Nick > On 5 Mar 2014, at 19:50, ASF IRC Bot wrote: > > Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting at Wed Mar 5 19

Re: couchdb commit: updated refs/heads/1.6.x to ce3e89d

Dave and I spent some time on this yesterday. He has the notes so can give a better summary than I can, but our feeling is that something bad is going on with replication and this patch at best masks it. However the problem only seems to arise within etap tests where database creation and replicati

  1   2   3   >