Re: CouchDB components version policy

2014-07-22 Thread Robert Newson
Yes, we will tag the dependencies and update rebar.config to point to them. That's how we do this at Cloudant. Rebar config is only pointing to master branches while we're getting all the things working. Sent from my iPhone > On 22 Jul 2014, at 07:50, Samuel Williams > wrote: > > Is there

Re: CouchDB components version policy

2014-07-21 Thread Samuel Williams
Is there some way to maintain versions e.g. like how Gemfile does it? On 13/07/14 23:47, Alexander Shorin wrote: Hi devs, The question I'd like to raise is about version policy for the components which were extracted from main big couchdb.git repo into own separate ones. How to track their vers

Re: CouchDB components version policy

2014-07-18 Thread Jan Lehnardt
On 13 Jul 2014, at 13:47 , Alexander Shorin wrote: > Hi devs, > > The question I'd like to raise is about version policy for the > components which were extracted from main big couchdb.git repo into > own separate ones. How to track their version now? > > For instance, we have jquery-couch.git

Re: CouchDB components version policy

2014-07-13 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
The code components (fabric, mem3, rexi, etc) have their own version numbers (following semver). Because of the way this was merged, many historical tags (used by Cloudant during our regular release cycle) are missing as they would pull in the pre-ip-cleared versions of the modules. I don’t se

CouchDB components version policy

2014-07-13 Thread Alexander Shorin
Hi devs, The question I'd like to raise is about version policy for the components which were extracted from main big couchdb.git repo into own separate ones. How to track their version now? For instance, we have jquery-couch.git now - jquery client for CouchDB which was actively used by Futon an