Ah okay, that makes sense, thanks. Will leave it w/ you!
On 20 March 2015 at 20:15, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> Hi Noah,
>
> I waited for adding it to the homepage and also using the list at all
> until we have full git and github, as we currently have both svn and
> git in parallel running (jan rep
Hi Noah,
I waited for adding it to the homepage and also using the list at all
until we have full git and github, as we currently have both svn and
git in parallel running (jan reported this wednesday meeting). Maybe
it is a first good task for the website group once we have git and
github :)
I w
Should we add www@ to the homepage? If so, what description?
On 17 March 2015 at 22:06, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>> On 17 Mar 2015, at 19:07, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, why not combine them?
>>
>> So far, our lists have been split on activity type, not by code
>> submodule. I think that's the ri
> On 17 Mar 2015, at 19:07, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Hmm, why not combine them?
>
> So far, our lists have been split on activity type, not by code
> submodule. I think that's the right approach.
>
> So, dev@ as a default, but with a strong focus on the Erlang side of
> things, marketing@ for ev
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Instead of having two front-end lists for different front-end
> projects, let's have one place for front-end people. That could be
> used for anything from Futon, Fauxton, our main website, or anything
> else front-end-y.
Nice idea!
--
,,,^
Hmm, why not combine them?
So far, our lists have been split on activity type, not by code
submodule. I think that's the right approach.
So, dev@ as a default, but with a strong focus on the Erlang side of
things, marketing@ for everything from promotion through to brand,
l10n@ for anything to do
Fauxton is also getting a separate list. Thanks for reminding me, that's for
the other thread. Although I wouldn't mix that in with the website dev bits.
Cheers
Jan
--
> On 17.03.2015, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Oh, hmm. When you put it like that. I guess it was felt that dev@ was
> too
I believe this is more for the web-dev side, less the content.
Best
Jan
--
> On 17 Mar 2015, at 18:49, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> Robert, who is "we"? This references as discussion that I can't find
> on the list anywhere.
>
> Also, bit late to the party here, but why do we need a separate www@
>
Oh, hmm. When you put it like that. I guess it was felt that dev@ was
too crowded by Erlang stuff and not that friendly to front-end people.
Hmm. Perhaps we can expand the remit of the list to cover Futon
development then? It would be super cool to make the project more
welcoming / easy to contribu
Robert, who is "we"? This references as discussion that I can't find
on the list anywhere.
Also, bit late to the party here, but why do we need a separate www@
list? This seems like marketing@ wheelhouse to me. Can't we just
discuss the redesign there? The website is, in the overall scheme of
thin
Hi list,
we are planning to introduce a new website ailing list for all work
regarding http://couchdb.apache.org/ for all things related to the
website.
If nobody objects I would send the request to Infra in the next days.
Best,
Robert
11 matches
Mail list logo
