Re: [DISCUSS] VS Code dev container?

I don't follow CouchDB much now, but I do use VS Code all the time, and have to bring new users on board with it. Docker and dev containers are very nice technologies for reducing VS Code start-up costs to almost zero, so this seems like a great plan, and I'd be in favour of anything that reduces f

Re: [PROPOSAL] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

FRA ticket to have these settings changed on our primary repos > where Travis CI is enabled: > > couchdb > couchdb-fauxton > couchdb-documentation > couchdb-nano > couchdb-docker > > I will be explicitly leaving out couchdb-pkg, since CI doesn't (yet) > make sens

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

hatch" that we need. > > -Joan > > - Original Message - > From: "Nick North" > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, "Joan Touzet" > Sent: Friday, 18 August, 2017 9:48:40 AM > Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that caus

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

This is pretty much the set of restrictions we have on the master branch in my organisation, and it works well. We also require PR reviews before merging, but anyone in the team can do the review, including the PR author. This means the author has to make a conscious decision on whether the changes

Re: [DISCUSSION] Disallow all merges of PRs to master that cause tests to fail

+1. Having put all the effort in to to get to a clean test suite, it would be a great shame to let it slip. The effort to remain clean is much less than the effort to get to that state in the first place: failing tests are easier to fix when they first occur and everything is fresh in the author's

Re: [Lazy Consensus] Move from JIRA to GitHub Issues

+1 Nick > On 18 May 2017, at 07:01, Elisiano Petrini wrote: > > +1 👍🍻 > > Best Regards, > Elisiano Petrini > >> On May 17, 2017, at 9:38 PM, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Hi everyone. >> >> As most of you know, a few months ago we moved many of our primary >> repositories from primary Apache

Re: [PLANNING] CouchDB 2.1

Hi Joan, Having done some work with the Windows build in the past, I'm happy to try to help with automating it. If you think there's anything I can do, maybe we could have a separate discussion on the steps needed to make it better. Nick > On 16 Dec 2016, at 19:20, Joan Touzet wrote: > > The

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.0.0-rc.1

Thanks Joan, Trying Windows installation on another machine shows that the trust problem is down to Windows Smartscreen, and this StackOverflow question suggests there's not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 2.0.0-rc.1

Windows 10, using the Windows installer. MD5 OK. Installed successfully, Fauxton working, setup in single node mode, created test database and a few docs. All good. A few non-blocking incidents: - Windows did not trust the installer, which might put cautious users off. - It ignored my at

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

ck On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 18:00 Nick North wrote: > Maybe I did something stupid with the PR. If I can get to a PC this > evening I'll take a look. > > Nick > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 at 17:41, Paul Davis > wrote: > >> That Jiffy error does seem like a conversion issue

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

atch for that on > Windows and looking back I'm not seeing anything from after 2013 that > looks related (in davisp/jiffy). Looking at the apache/jiffy repo we > use merges so I'd think it'd be unlikely to have been overwritten but > I guess its always possible. > > Pau

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

some more > fixes > > and brings even more stability. In the meantime, deleting dev/lib is > indeed > > the best way to produce reliable results. So is switching between > > auth-tests-wip and master. But there's progress => it might all end up > > nicely on master. &

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

measure to produce the logs: > > for t in test/javascript/tests/*.js; do rm -rf dev/lib; dev/run -n 1 -q > --with-admin-party-please test/javascript/run $t 2>&1 | tee -a jstest2.log; > done > > Maybe it makes sense for you to start w/ something similar to produce some

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

Sorry - I meant a single node cluster in that last message. And I meant to sign my name correctly. Nick On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 at 16:56 Nick North wrote: > I'm trying these tests now, and find that there are still a lot of JS > failures with a single cluster. Many of them look s

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

sites to get them to build under the modern Windows b uild system. > > > > Parenthetically, it _is_ possible to use binary installs for the > prerequisites (OpenSSL, libcurl, Erlang, SM 1.8.5), but Dave, Nick North > and I have evolved the glazier system over a number of years and it&

Re: 2.0 & Windows: status update

Hi Joan. This sounds like an improvement on my last Windows build attempt, which still had a couple of eunit failures outside the os_process area. I'll attempt to reproduce your results today, and report back. Nick On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 at 00:34 Joan Touzet wrote: > Replying to my own email: dev/

Re: Datazenit OpenSource License for CouchDB commiters / contributors

On a similar topic, a quick reminder that JetBrains tools are available free to Apache contributors. These include development tools for many languages, team collaboration systems, and ReSharper, the invaluable tool for Windows .NET developers. I just renewed my ReSharper licence, so a big thank yo

Re: Compiling snappy under Windows

hdb.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 12:15:25 PM > > Subject: Re: Compiling snappy under Windows > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nick North > > wrote: > > > I'm not exactly sure what you are proposing here. Are you saying we > > >

Re: Compiling snappy under Windows

idn't have a chance to do that as I couldn't check > the result. > > However, I don't see any ssize_t related references. May be this won't > work, but worth to try. > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Nick North wrote: > > I&

Compiling snappy under Windows

I'm trying to compile up CouchDB 2.0 on Windows, using Joan Touzet's PowerShell script. This used to work, but the 1.1.3 Snappy update in October broke Windows compatibility, as it uses the ssize_t type, which MS C++ does not understand. The original google/snappy repository code deals with this i

Re: Windows build failing on couch_ejson_compare.c

not dirty by any means. > > > > > On Jul 18, 2015, at 8:28 AM, Nick North wrote: > > > > I see a couple of obvious solutions to this problem: > > > > > > 1. Use the thread_local keyword rather than __thread. The semantics are > > not ident

Re: Windows build failing on couch_ejson_compare.c

nyone have any thoughts on which is the better way forward? Or have alternative suggestions? Nick On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 at 22:09 Nick North wrote: > Answering my own question: looks as if Microsoft uses __declspec(thread) > rather than __thread. > > Nick > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2

Re: Windows build failing on couch_ejson_compare.c

Answering my own question: looks as if Microsoft uses __declspec(thread) rather than __thread. Nick On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 at 22:02 Nick North wrote: > I'm trying out @wohali's Windows build, which went well up to compilation > of couch_ejson_compare.c, where it seems to be trip

Windows build failing on couch_ejson_compare.c

I'm trying out @wohali's Windows build, which went well up to compilation of couch_ejson_compare.c, where it seems to be tripping up over the changes in the recent commit to optimise performance. Specifically

Re: Windows build blocked by khash NIF

cant. We > have to do the hash either way, so its basically just the overhead > from calling a BIF which doesn't even register on the radar for things > that we think about for performance. > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Nick North wrote: > > This feels conce

Re: Windows build blocked by khash NIF

ERL_BIN_PTR(term); > int len = ERL_BIN_SIZE(term); > return hash(data, len); // TODO, write hash function > } > else { > return (hash_val_t) make_hash2(node->key); > } > } > #endif > > > > On 12 Jul 2015, at 09:14, Nick North

Re: Windows build blocked by khash NIF

I'm with Dave - it would be acceptable to ship a modified BEAM if it's a short-term measure. It's not great, but better than not having Windows support. Nick On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 at 08:35 Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, at 09:21 AM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Jul 201

Re: Building CouchDB 2.0

uch better Dockerfile from the community. > > B. > > > On 28 Jun 2015, at 16:48, Nick North wrote: > > > > I'm hoping eventually to try building CouchDB 2.0 on Windows, but thought > > I'd start with Ubuntu 15.04 to give some point of reference. Using

Building CouchDB 2.0

I'm hoping eventually to try building CouchDB 2.0 on Windows, but thought I'd start with Ubuntu 15.04 to give some point of reference. Using a clone of master from yesterday, the instructions in README-DEV worked well up to the point of completing "make check", after a couple of dependency issues,

Re: [VOTE] CouchDB Logo - Round #3

-1 Paul Davis +0 Nick Pavlika globe -1 Nick Pavlika pentagon/hexagon +0 Nick Pavlika couch (I like the second one down the most) -1 Brad Noble -1 Sean Barclay +1 Constantin Angheloiu +0 Old logo Thanks to everyone for the work that's gone into this. Nick On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 at 08:58 Peter W wrot

Re: Problem installing couchDB because of cygwin dependency

If you click on the Cygwin link in Glazier, it downloads a setup-x86.exe file, while the one you refer to is setup-x86_64.exe, which looks as though it may be a 64-bit rather than a 32-bit version. I can't see any reason why 64-bit setup should fail, but Glazier uses 32-bit Cygwin, so it might be w

Re: Problem installing couchDB because of cygwin dependency

Following Glazier is definitely your best bet for building on Windows, but it is still a fiddly process. Do you need to build it yourself, or can you use one of the pre-built installers? The latter is better if you just want to run CouchDb. On your Cygwin problem: I've never had any problems with

Re: The ASF adopts CouchDB's Code of Conduct & Diversity Statement!

Nice! Congratulations on a great piece of work. Nick On 18 November 2014 14:15, Andy Wenk wrote: > woot - this is fantastic :) > > On 18 November 2014 14:28, Klaus Trainer wrote: > > > This is great news! > > > > Thanks :) > > > > > > On 18.11.2014 13:04, Joan Touzet wrote: > > > Today the ASF

Re: Discontinue the erlang@ mailing list?

There was an earlier plan to review all the lists periodically and kill off the unused ones. I agree this one should go as it has no traffic, On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 at 06:46 Alexander Shorin wrote: > +1. That was good idea, but suddenly it didn't become successful. > -- > ,,,^..^,,, > > > On Tue, No

Re: CouchDB and QuickCheck tests

e without QuickCheck, but you see the idea. However, I'm not sure if the general scheme fits well with the Apache philosophy. Nick On 13 October 2014 13:41, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Nick North wrote: > > As they have now looked at CouchDb the

Re: CouchDB and QuickCheck tests

Interesting post. I came across Quviq a while ago, and wondered if anyone in the CouchDb community had tried out the freebie version with an eye to some automated tests. As they have now looked at CouchDb themselves, maybe there could be some collaboration with the

Re: [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1521) multipart parser gets multiple attachments mixed up

My recollection of that bit of code is the same as Jan's: it processes in JSON order. I did start thinking about how to improve this behaviour at one point, but got stuck trying to work out something that is backwards-compatible. It's some while since I looked at it so I can't bring to mind exactly

Re: Code-signing binary releases?

+1 If the service is there it seems a good idea to use it, and we are providing code that runs as a service so signing seems a good idea. However, CouchDb has never provoked the warnings that Windows gives about unsigned code for me, even though I have UAC enabled on all my systems. This may becau

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Jenn Schiffer elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Jenn! Nick > On 9 Sep 2014, at 15:06, Noah Slater wrote: > > Dear community, > > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee > has elected Jenn Schiffer as a CouchDB committer. > >Apache ID: jenn > >IRC nick: jennmoneydollars > >Twitter: jennsc

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Sebastian Rothbucher elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Sebastian! Nick On 4 September 2014 16:17, Andy Wenk wrote: > Moin Sebastian nice to have you on board :) > > Noch ne Hamburger Knackwurst he he :) > > Cheers > > Andy > > > On 4 September 2014 16:54, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > Welcome Sebastian! :) > > > > Best > > Jan > > -- > > > >

Re: 1.6.1-rc4 binaries

Windows binaries are now in the release location. Nick On 2 September 2014 12:25, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > > Windows binaries are up for test at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.6.1/rc.4 (I > > > > > > perfect, tyvm. > > > > > hope it wasn't premature to put t

Re: 1.6.1-rc4 binaries

Also seems to be working well on Windows Server 2008 R2, for those who use that version. Nick On 2 September 2014 12:37, Nick North wrote: > Thanks Dave & Sebastian for your feedback. I'll copy the files over later > today. > > Nick > > > On 2 September 2014

Re: 1.6.1-rc4 binaries

Thanks Dave & Sebastian for your feedback. I'll copy the files over later today. Nick On 2 September 2014 12:25, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > > Windows binaries are up for test at > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.6.1/rc.4 (I > > > > > > perfect, tyvm. > > > > > ho

Re: 1.6.1-rc4 binaries

Windows binaries are up for test at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.6.1/rc.4 (I hope it wasn't premature to put them there). There are files for R14B04 and R16B02. Usual drill: 1. Download the files for your preferred version. 2. Test signatures. 3. Double-click the exe

Re: 1.6.1-rc4 binaries

Good idea - thanks for the prompt. I'll put some Windows binaries up for testing tomorrow. Nick > On 31 Aug 2014, at 20:43, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Heya, > > I’ve made Mac binaries for the ongoing 1.6.1 vote: > > http://people.apache.org/~jan/dist/packages/mac/1.6.1/ > > Testing as usual: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.1-rc.4

Windows 8.1 Enterprise x64, Erlang R14B04: sig, sha, md5, verify installation, JS tests all OK +1 Nick On 22 August 2014 09:51, Andy Wenk wrote: > Hi, > > here are my results for my box - Erlang/OTP 17, Mac OS X 10.9.4: > > verify sigs and keys: ok > check the candidate: ok > distcheck: ok

Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for1.6.1-rc.3

Windows x86 R16B02 binaries are up at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.6.1/rc.3/ Nick On 19 August 2014 17:58, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > The Mac builds, that is. > > On 19 Aug 2014, at 18:55 , Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > I won’t be able to get to this before Thursday th

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-2295) Connection hangs on document update for multipart/related and transfer encoding chunked request

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14100565#comment-14100565 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-2295: - Branch 1956-attachment-handling ha

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.1-rc.1

Oops - forgot the important bit: all JS tests passed. Nick > On 14 Aug 2014, at 22:14, Nick North wrote: > > +1 > > sig, sha, md5 OK > > Win 8.1 Enterprise x64, OTP R16B04 > > >> On 14 August 2014 17:39, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: >> +1 >> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.1-rc.1

+1 sig, sha, md5 OK Win 8.1 Enterprise x64, OTP R16B04 On 14 August 2014 17:39, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > +1 > > sig, sha, mg5, distcheck OK > > Debian Wheezy 7.6 amd64 backports > - OTP R15B01 > - Spidermonkey 1.8.5 > > > FreeBSD 10.0-STABLE amd64 > - OTP 17.1 > - Spidermonkey 1.8.5 > > A+ >

Re: [VOTE] CouchDB Code of Conduct & Diversity Statement

+1 On 4 August 2014 12:20, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > +1 > > > On 04 Aug 2014, at 10:30 , Robert Samuel Newson > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > My preference to simplify some of the technical terms in the CoC do not > prevent me voting for the intent behind them, and I recognise that no list > of diversit

Re: [VOTE] [REVISED] Official CouchDB bylaws

and we'll work all > this in later. > > On 24 July 2014 12:02, Nick North wrote: > > +10 (in the spirit of section 3.3) > > > > Fantastic work by everyone - many thanks. I have just a few tiny proof > > reading things that could be fixed, but have no big impac

Re: [VOTE] [REVISED] Official CouchDB bylaws

+10 (in the spirit of section 3.3) Fantastic work by everyone - many thanks. I have just a few tiny proof reading things that could be fixed, but have no big impact: - In section 2 the links to the PMC section don't seem to take you to that section, just to the wiki page. Ditto the link to

JetBrains tools for CouchDB committers

JetBrains , the makers of development tools such as IDEs IntelliJ IDEA, PhpStorm, and AppCode; .NET tools like ReSharper and dotCover; and team tools TeamCity and YouTrack, very kindly offer free copies of their products to developers on active open source projects. Couch

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Lena Reinhard elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Lena! Nick On 21 June 2014 16:03, Klaus Trainer wrote: > Wohooo! > > Welcome Lena :) > > > On 06/21/2014 04:59 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > > Dear community, > > > > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee > > has elected Lena Reinhard as a CouchDB committer.

Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.6.0-rc.5

Windows installers for R14B04 and R16B02 are at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/1.6.0/rc.5. To test: - download the files for a version (you don't need the .gz file) - check signature - double click the exe to install. - if you installed as a Windows service, start t

Re: [REQUEST] Binaries for 1.6.0-rc.5

I think the Windows ones are ready to go, but will double check this evening and see about uploading them. Nick On 3 June 2014 12:17, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 02 Jun 2014, at 09:14 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman > wrote: > >> Everyone is wel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.5

May 11, 2014 at 9:58 PM, Nick North wrote: > > I've tried the RC5 Windows build with Erlang 17.0, and all the > JavaScript > > tests pass, which is promising. I haven't tried any of the configure > > options, like dirty schedulers, though. > > > > Interestin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.5

​ Nick On 7 May 2014 16:40, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > From: Nick North nort...@gmail.com(mailto:nort...@gmail.com) > Reply: dev@couchdb.apache.org dev@couchdb.apache.org(mailto: > dev@couchdb.apache.org) > Date: 06. Mai 2014 at 22:40:56 > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org dev@couchdb.a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.5

give it a go. Nick On 6 May 2014 17:07, Alexander Shorin wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Nick North wrote: > > RC4 was good on Windows for both Erlang R14B04 and R16B02. I'll check out > > RC5 later today and report back. > > Hi Nick, > > thanks for g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.5

RC4 was good on Windows for both Erlang R14B04 and R16B02. I'll check out RC5 later today and report back. Nick On 6 May 2014 14:15, Andy Wenk wrote: > I completely trust Garren, because he has the same box than I have :) > > (I already tested rc4 successfully) > Cheers > > Andy > > > On 6 May

Re: svn commit: r5089 - in /release/couchdb/binary/win/1.5.1: setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R16B02.exe setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R16B02.exe.asc setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R16B02.exe.md5 setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R16B02.exe.sha

Thanks Jan. I felt that the old build was so badly broken that we should just replace it, but I take your point that it's useful to have different names so that we can work out what artefact users have installed easily. I'll do as you suggest if this happens again (and I really hope it doesn't).

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct

is shorter and better formatted, but it > > seemed to cover less ground than the Debian one. > > > > -Joan > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Nick North" > > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache CouchDB Developer Code of Conduct

+1 on the CoC idea. I also like the Django example as a starting point. And definitely +1 on no profanity - plenty of people are offended by it, and that in itself should be enough to rule it out. It also adds nothing to the process of communicating ideas to the community. Nick On 29 April 2014

Re: Testing Upgrade to 1.6.x

​1.6.0 RC3 was fine​ - I haven't tried since then though. Nick On 27 April 2014 16:27, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > Excellent, so the problem no longer occurs with a clean 1.6.x build? > > On 27 Apr 2014, at 14:50, Nick North wrote: > > > It does look like the

Re: Testing Upgrade to 1.6.x

It does look like the Windows 1.5 problem where, as Robert says, I had not cleaned up properly from a previous build. Nick On 27 April 2014 00:38, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > > Did you 'make clean' first? This looks like you have a module with the old > #changes_args record and other modules

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1994) merge rcouch with couchdb 1.6 in a branch

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13974872#comment-13974872 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1994: - This is very nice indeed - the Windows b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.3

Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04 and R16B02: Sigs OK Hashes OK Verify install OK All JS tests OK +1 Nick On 18 April 2014 12:01, Andy Wenk wrote: > Here are my test results for Mac OS X 10.9.2 Erlang R16B03-1 > > sigs,hashes -> OK > make distcheck -> OK > make install -> OK > run CouchDB -> OK > v

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Joan Touzet joins the PMC

Great news! Nick On 10 April 2014 10:00, Andy Wenk wrote: > Joan - welcome - very nice to have you on board :) > > > On 10 April 2014 11:03, Garren Smith wrote: > > > Fantastic, congrats Joan. > > > > On 10 Apr 2014, at 10:57 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > > > > > Dear community, > > > > > > I am

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.1-rc.1

Following Jan's lead, the 1.5.1 Windows binaries for R14B04 and R16B02 are also available on Dropbox: https://www.dropbox.com/s/hvpohcey3og9wm6/setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R14B04.exe https://www.dropbox.com/s/ee79wtzgvfss169/setup-couchdb-1.5.1_R14B04.exe.md5 https://www.dropbox.com/s/8mi56tdqq42nswz/setu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.1-rc.1

I have Windows ones for Erlang R14B04, but won't be able to build R16 until tomorrow evening. I'll do that unless anyone else gets in first. I'm also not quite sure what needs to be done with them, but I'm sure it won't be too hard to figure out. Nick On 2 April 2014 21:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] 1.6.0 proposals

I'm also +1 on cutting a new branch from master. On the recbuf issue, I'm in favour of option 1. I can't remember - would that allow us to get rid of the mochiweb RECBUF_SIZE define as well? The fewer magic numbers, the better. Nick On 28 March 2014 14:18, Andy Wenk wrote: > Dave great summar

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Robert Kowalski elected as CouchDB committer

Congratulations, and welcome! Nick On 28 March 2014 13:26, Klaus Trainer wrote: > Great! Welcome Robert :) > > > On 03/28/2014 01:12 PM, Andy Wenk wrote: > > Dear community, > > > > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee > has > > elected Robert Kowalski as a C

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.5.1-rc.1

Windows 8.1, Erlang R14B04. Hashes OK Javascript tests all passed (the Windows build cannot run the etap tests, so can't check the large attachments failure) +1 On 28 March 2014 04:49, Alexander Shorin wrote: > Copy it here too: > > Gentoo Linux Erlang R16B02, SM 1.8.5: all tests passed > Fre

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1986) 04-replication-large-atts.t times out

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13944865#comment-13944865 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1986: - Sorry - I was not very clear. The pro

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1986) 04-replication-large-atts.t times out

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13943973#comment-13943973 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1986: - That's a possibility: some bits o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1

I'm up for some (more) debugging to try to track down the large attachments problem. This is a fairly busy week, but I am free all day Wednesday if that works. I'm also setting up a local FreeBSD machine to try it out myself, but Windows Hyper-V is giving some problems. Nick On 14 March 2014 18:

Re: [GitHub] couchdb pull request: Multipart/related handling improvements

Good point - thanks. I've closed it. Nick On 14 March 2014 19:18, tleyden wrote: > Github user tleyden commented on the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/138#issuecomment-37685288 > > Can https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1403 be closed as a > duplica

[jira] [Closed] (COUCHDB-1403) Multipart upload fails with exception if request body is chunked

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nick North closed COUCHDB-1403. --- Resolution: Duplicate Included in issue 1956 > Multipart upload fails with exception if requ

Re: couchdb commit: updated refs/heads/1.6.x to ce3e89d

Dave and I spent some time on this yesterday. He has the notes so can give a better summary than I can, but our feeling is that something bad is going on with replication and this patch at best masks it. However the problem only seems to arise within etap tests where database creation and replicati

Re: Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting

The great thing about being the only person at the meeting is that you get to assign all the actions :-) I'm not around this evening, but will do my action tomorrow if that's OK. Nick > On 5 Mar 2014, at 19:50, ASF IRC Bot wrote: > > Summary of IRC Meeting in #couchdb-meeting at Wed Mar 5 19

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1

Not at my PC just now so can't check the exact branch name that speeds up attachment parsing, but I think it's 1953. It does seem to make some difference to that test (though it's not a fix), and is in master but I wasn't sure if I should merge it to 1.6, so it is not currently there. Nick > O

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1986) 04-replication-large-atts.t times out

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13912963#comment-13912963 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1986: - That's definitely interesting to kn

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1986) 04-replication-large-atts.t times out

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13912914#comment-13912914 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1986: - It would be interesting to try with the

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1986) 04-replication-large-atts.t times out

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13912889#comment-13912889 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1986: - It may have absolutely no bearing on

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Benjamin Young elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Benjamin! Nick On 25 February 2014 09:53, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > Dear community, > > I am pleased to announce that the CouchDB Project Management Committee has > elected Benjamin Young as a CouchDB committer. > > Apache ID: bigbluehat > > IRC nick: bigbluehat > > Twi

Re: [GitHub] couchdb pull request: Add polyfill for IE8 Array.indexOf

I also initially took the view that CouchDb should not have to support IE8, as Microsoft won't. But searching around shows that Windows 7 initially came with IE8, which puts it under the same support cycle as Windows 7, meaning there are years of pain yet to suffer. Nick On 19 February 2014 10:3

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Klaus Trainer elected as CouchDB committer

Welcome Klaus! Nick On 18 February 2014 16:26, Andy Wenk wrote: > hey awesome :) Welcome to the club ! > > > On 18 February 2014 17:25, Alexander Shorin wrote: > > > Congratulations, Klaus! And welcome (: > > -- > > ,,,^..^,,, > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >

Re: [NOTICE] Create marketing@ lis (Was: Re: Marketing suggestion)

PS I don't want to be seen as filibustering here so, if people consider this to be a waste of time, I'm +1 on creating the list if the people who want to do the work want it. (Even though it's not my own inclination.) Nick > On 4 Feb 2014, at 17:30, Nick North wrote: >

Re: [NOTICE] Create marketing@ lis (Was: Re: Marketing suggestion)

I'm probably going to regret jumping into this, especially as I'm modifying my earlier view a bit, but how about getting some objectivity by basing a decision on whether to go ahead on the record of the other spin-off lists that have already been created? I have no idea how much traffic they hav

Re: Marketing suggestion

I'd be in favour of keeping the number of lists small until it becomes clear that some topic needs to spin off into its own list. While the volume of marketing emails is low, it's not hard for devs who aren't that interested in marketing to ignore them, just as those who aren't interested in spe

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1685) POSTing multipart/related to a database doesn't create a document

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882290#comment-13882290 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1685: - Following build problems with PR 91, I

[jira] [Updated] (COUCHDB-1956) Make attachment lengths and Content-Length optional for multipart requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Nick North updated COUCHDB-1956: Attachment: 1956Notes.txt Review notes for PR 138 > Make attachment lengths and Content-Len

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1956) Make attachment lengths and Content-Length optional for multipart requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1956?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13882289#comment-13882289 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1956: - Pull request 138 (https://github.com/ap

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1953) Speed up parsing of multipart/related requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13881784#comment-13881784 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1953: - Many thanks everyone. I'll p

[jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1953) Speed up parsing of multipart/related requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13880969#comment-13880969 ] Nick North commented on COUCHDB-1953: - Thanks Dave - I'll update release

Re: Top posting in threads on the list's

On 23 January 2014 08:16, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Paul Davis > wrote: > > +1. Top posting is the worst. > > In case you're being sarcastic (which seems likely), perhaps that is > not the most productive response to a fairly low-key, open email. If > you disagree

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1

After some help from @dch following a brain failure during Windows build: sha, md5, sig: OK Windows 8.1 EN x64, with Erlang R14B04, R15B03-1, R16B02 Verify install OK for all three builds. Futon tests all OK except for show_documents, which fails on all three. But then it also fails on my 1.5.0 b

Re: we need more reviews

On 20 January 2014 12:26, Dale Harvey wrote: > I fully agree, its something I mentioned at the couchdb conf in vancouver, > a review first system encourages contributions and has multiple benefits > > * At least 2 people look at the code, less likely to push silly mistakes > * Can codify and pr

Re: Committer questions

an wrote: > On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Nick North wrote: > > First I'm wondering about when it's OK to push work to the Apache > > repository. If you put out a non-controversial GitHub pull request, and > > there are no negative comments after a reasonable time

  1   2   3   >