i think infra could just accept the repo once there is a possibility in
having github issues for asf projects
i have transferred a lot of repos (but not with the asf). the cool thing is
that you get a redirect for free, keep all your previous issues, wikis, PRs
etc...
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 3:34
Right, good point, Alexander.
In that case, I would say, let's not do an actual GitHub "transfer." There
are only a few tickets. I think we could move the key ones over by hand
ourselves; and in the fullness of time, it won't much matter.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
Yes
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Alexander Shorin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> > 3. Can you chime in at [1] ? Can you open the link? I basically asked
> infra
> > if we can have Github issues enabled in all our subprojects and if they
> can
> > migrate
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Robert Kowalski wrote:
> 3. Can you chime in at [1] ? Can you open the link? I basically asked infra
> if we can have Github issues enabled in all our subprojects and if they can
> migrate nano for us together with issues, wiki, closed/open/prs etc. If you
> can no
Hey Jason,
thanks for bringing this up again! Really appreciated!
1. cool!
2. For Fauxton we just use the "Component" field in Jira. Do you mean
setting up a whole new Jira (e.g. CouchDB, Cassandra) or setting up a
subcomponent. The latter is easy, just type in the new component name when
creati
