On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Benoit Chesneau
> wrote:
> > Also yes I really think that the "I have a dream" quote is already too
> much
> > tarnished to not mention it further even if people had the better
> > intentions when they mention
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> Also yes I really think that the "I have a dream" quote is already too much
> tarnished to not mention it further even if people had the better
> intentions when they mention it.
One cannot argue with such statements. One can only underlin
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
> Oh, for God's sake.
>
>
? the idea here is to not put the cart before the horse. So before jumping
in a synthesis and edited text, I am asking (hence the question mark) if it
wouldn't be easier for a start to only collect raw idea in a list fr
Oh, for God's sake.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> any mention to martin luther king should be removed.Please don't associate
> his vision to something as ridiculous as a vision for a product.
>
> For the rest shouldn't this document link tothe still running thread and
any mention to martin luther king should be removed.Please don't associate
his vision to something as ridiculous as a vision for a product.
For the rest shouldn't this document link tothe still running thread and
only collect raw ideas from all? there are indeed too much edit in this doc
and it wo
Thanks, Jim. That is basically my plan. To be clear, I would ship
"outsourced mode" (browserid.org hosted JavaScript and verification)
in a CouchDB release. It's just that I would work to get "tinfoil hat
mode" added in for a subsequent release. Outsourced mode already
exists (modulo a rewrite and
I've been in touch with the Mozilla folks off and on over this. I've not
checked with them recently on this but at least for the time being, unless your
plan is to turn CouchDB into a full IDP and perform the JOSE/JWT verification
that the client generates, you should not host the bits for Brow
My guess is "preferred" will depend on the usage type. Frankly IMO to
a first approximation, nobody uses disconnected operation anymore. (At
least, if they do, they have the resources to fork CouchDB.)
In practice, hosting a copy of include.js has been problematic. Logins
break every month or two.
My guess is "preferred" will depend on the usage type. Frankly IMO to
a first approximation, nobody uses disconnected operation anymore. (At
least, if they do, they have the resources to fork CouchDB.)
In practice, hosting a copy of include.js has been problematic. Logins
break every month or two.
Hi Jason,
I think having "all in house" solution is preferred since it will
allow private local area networks to use such auth for CouchDB without
need to access some remote resources. With browserid / persona it will
be possible to have CouchDB as auth server for other instances, right?
--
,,,^..
(Breaking off from the "IRC meeting" thread.)
Credit where it's due: The initial push for Persona in CouchDB came
from Randall Leeds.
Dirkjan says to use the hosted include.js file instead of serving it
internally. I kind of agree, but note that CouchDB hosts its own
JQuery. The priority is not t
Alexander Shorin created COUCHDB-1865:
-
Summary: Use HTTP API examples as tests...
Key: COUCHDB-1865
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1865
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: I
Alexander Shorin created COUCHDB-1864:
-
Summary: Use sphinx-httpdomain for HTTP API reference
Key: COUCHDB-1864
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1864
Project: CouchDB
Is
Yashin,
I was just going through your proposal here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Proposal+for+CouchDB+automated+release+process+documentation+-+Yashin+Mehaboobe
It occurred to me that "make" is not the best place to put this stuff.
Anything that happens in make cannot assu
14 matches
Mail list logo
