[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson resolved COUCHDB-1404.
Resolution: Not A Problem
JIRA is for reporting bugs, not for support.
Please see our do
How to password protect couchdb web interface (futon)?
--
Key: COUCHDB-1404
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1404
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Fu
Hey all,
just a quick heads up if you are in or near Berlin. We are
running a CouchDB Meetup tomorrow night. All details are
on lanyrd:
http://lanyrd.com/2012/couchdb-meetup-berlin-february/
If you want to give a talk, we'd have time for one or two
more (30 minutes), let me know off-list.
Se
Thank you - that answers the question perfectly. Makes my life more
complex, but more interesting.
Nick
On 7 February 2012 16:11, Robert Newson wrote:
> The replicator replicates in parallel, so even if this property held,
> replication will violate it. There is no transactional boundary
> grea
Old thread is old. But the new code works. Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Yep, that seems reasonable. Let me know when I can test again. :)
>
> Done. Can you test again?
>
The replicator replicates in parallel, so even if this property held,
replication will violate it. There is no transactional boundary
greater than a single document update.
B.
On 7 February 2012 16:03, Nick North wrote:
> I have a question about the order in which documents are committed to the
I have a question about the order in which documents are committed to the
database, which I hope a knowledgeable dev can help me out with.
The question is (I think): if I create documents, using CouchDb-assigned
document ids, will they appear in the _changes feed in the order that the
ids were ass
Dave Cottlehuber suggested running the tests in Private Browsing mode,
which seems to help, as does running them one at a time.
Nick
On 7 February 2012 15:18, Bryan Green wrote:
> Good to hear. I have the same issues trying the test-suite with 1.1.1 on
> Windows 7 with Firefox 10.
>
> On Tue,
Good to hear. I have the same issues trying the test-suite with 1.1.1 on
Windows 7 with Firefox 10.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Nick North wrote:
> Apologies to everyone: I sent the same message today as I sent a couple of
> days ago. What I meant to say today was that I have now also teste
Apologies to everyone: I sent the same message today as I sent a couple of
days ago. What I meant to say today was that I have now also tested on
Windows Server 2008 R2 and the Futon tests are all behaving fine there, but
they have to be nursed through a little. That makes me think that the
previou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Newson resolved COUCHDB-1402.
Resolution: Not A Problem
> Crash on Views - {'EXIT', {{badmatch, {error, {enoent, [{
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202443#comment-13202443
]
Christopher Betz commented on COUCHDB-1402:
---
I installed to C:\Apache\CouchDB
I've just got to try the 1.2.0 Windows binaries at
http://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/snapshots/20120127/ on Windows 7 and
Windows 8 Preview and hit a few initial issues with the Futon test
suite which seem worth feeding back to the list.
1. If you upgrade an existing instance by uninstalling, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202414#comment-13202414
]
Dave Cottlehuber commented on COUCHDB-1402:
---
the path is odd - c:/PROGRA~1/Apa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202317#comment-13202317
]
Christopher Betz commented on COUCHDB-1402:
---
Thanks for the reply! I downloade
On Feb 7, 2012, at 12:50 , Noah Slater wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> I'd suggest this looks like we are not using mochiweb.app.src at all
>> and we could either delete it or keep to keep file-parity with upstream.
>>
>> (file-parity interlude, I'd prefer to
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> I'd suggest this looks like we are not using mochiweb.app.src at all
> and we could either delete it or keep to keep file-parity with upstream.
>
> (file-parity interlude, I'd prefer to keep upstream directories in as
> much of the original
On Feb 6, 2012, at 20:04 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On Feb 4, 2012, at 02:43 , Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> Doing some traveling but quick thoughts inline:
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I have a 1.2.0 release ready to go, but there are a few problems th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13202197#comment-13202197
]
James Howe commented on COUCHDB-1402:
-
ENOENT is basically file not found. Looks lik
19 matches
Mail list logo
