302 reported when it should say 'you are not a server or admin"
---
Key: COUCHDB-1189
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1189
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045205#comment-13045205
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1184:
Tracked it down. Bug is here:
I say update it to say to upgrade to 1.0.2 (or newer) and leave it
just above 1.0.2
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> what about the 1.0.0 warning? It's part of the 1.0.1 text.
>
> On 6 June 2011 23:38, Noah Slater wrote:
>> Agreed.
>>
>> On 6 Jun 2011, at 23:12, Jan Lehnard
what about the 1.0.0 warning? It's part of the 1.0.1 text.
On 6 June 2011 23:38, Noah Slater wrote:
> Agreed.
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 23:12, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On 6 Jun 2011, at 07:44, Robert Newson wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13045187#comment-13045187
]
Paul Joseph Davis commented on COUCHDB-1184:
Odd. This appears to trigger on
Agreed.
On 6 Jun 2011, at 23:12, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 07:44, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we
>> should archive.
>>
>> For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
>> archive ever
On 6 Jun 2011, at 07:44, Robert Newson wrote:
> All,
>
> Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we
> should archive.
>
> For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
> archive everything else.
Sounds good.
Cheers
Jan
--
Thanx all!cheers
Mahesh Paolini-Subramanya | CTO | mah...@aptela.com | 703.386.1500 Ext. 9100593 Herndon Parkway | Suite 400 | Herndon, VA | www.aptela.comCheck out our Blog | Follow us on Twitter | Refer a Friend
On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:13 AM, Robert Newson wrote:Hello,Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been
Noah, any objections?
On 6 June 2011 17:20, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Robert Newson
> wrote:
>> How about we keep 1.1.0, 1.0.2 and 0.11.2 then?
>>
>> When 1.0.3 is released, we'll archive 1.0.2 at least. I don't think we
>> should be encouraging downloads of 0.11.2, s
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> How about we keep 1.1.0, 1.0.2 and 0.11.2 then?
>
> When 1.0.3 is released, we'll archive 1.0.2 at least. I don't think we
> should be encouraging downloads of 0.11.2, so I'd like to archive it
> soon.
>
> B.
>
Yes, this is exactly what I wa
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 16:32, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> To reiterate some points. Tony Stevenson tells me the infrastructure
>> policy is, "We expect PMcs to only keep 1 copy of each branch/major
>> version, anything else should be archived."
>
> Whe
How about we keep 1.1.0, 1.0.2 and 0.11.2 then?
When 1.0.3 is released, we'll archive 1.0.2 at least. I don't think we
should be encouraging downloads of 0.11.2, so I'd like to archive it
soon.
B.
On 6 June 2011 16:58, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 16:32, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> To re
On 6 Jun 2011, at 16:32, Paul Davis wrote:
> To reiterate some points. Tony Stevenson tells me the infrastructure
> policy is, "We expect PMcs to only keep 1 copy of each branch/major
> version, anything else should be archived."
Where did he tell you this? Is it on a mailing list somewhere? My
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:44, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we
>> should archive.
>>
>> For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
>> archive everything else.
>
>
On 6 Jun 2011, at 16:00, till wrote:
> I don't care so much about the CGI script, but I'm asking from a
> package maintainer perspective. So let's say I use a mirror to
> download CouchDB releases, etc. -- does archiving mean they are
> removed from mirrors?
Yep, that is the point of archiving t
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:47, till wrote:
>
>> Does 'archiving' break download links?
>
> Archiving involves removing the link from downloads.html, which points to a
> CGI script which automatically picks the closest mirror to your location. It
>
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Gavin McDonald"
> Date: 6 June 2011 09:03:24 GMT+01:00
> To:
> Subject: Travel Assistance applications now open for ApacheCon NA 2011
>
> The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is
> now accepting applications for ApacheCon
Relax, guys. :)
Daniele, could you post this to u...@couchdb.apache.org please?
Thanks.
On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:14, Robert Newson wrote:
> I'd say quite inappropriate, yes. It's telling that the question
> includes the offer too, rather than waiting to find out if it was
> inappropriate first...
On 6 Jun 2011, at 13:49, Paul Davis wrote:
>> Your Eternal Servant
>
> Woot! I could use a coffee. Two sugars no milk.
>
> Also, awesome work on releasing 1.1.
+1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044880#comment-13044880
]
David Zülke commented on COUCHDB-1188:
--
Full thread here: http://thread.gmane.org/g
On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:47, till wrote:
> Does 'archiving' break download links?
Archiving involves removing the link from downloads.html, which points to a CGI
script which automatically picks the closest mirror to your location. It also
involved moving the release to an archive distribution dir
On 6 Jun 2011, at 15:44, Robert Newson wrote:
> Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we
> should archive.
>
> For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
> archive everything else.
The ASF has asked us to tidy our distribution directory.
So I
On 01.06.2011, at 21:25, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On May 30, 2011, at 7:51 AM, David Zülke wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> Currently, it's necessary to have intimate-ish knowledge of the inner
>> workings of a view when calling it
>
> Hi David, this sounds like a good idea to me, and I like the n
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> All,
>
> Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we
> should archive.
>
> For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
> archive everything else.
>
> B.
>
Generally, +1
Does 'archiving' break dow
View query option defaults
--
Key: COUCHDB-1188
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1188
Project: CouchDB
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: JavaScript View Server
Affects Versions: 1.0.2
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 16:44, Robert Newson wrote:
> For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
> archive everything else.
Sounds just right to me.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
All,
Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we
should archive.
For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and
archive everything else.
B.
The idea is that the defaults also apply when invoking a list function. So you
need two rewrites, one for the view if you want to call it standalone, and one
for the list function. And then you still have the issue that the behavior of
the view is changed by the rewrite, which is confusing to an
I'd say quite inappropriate, yes. It's telling that the question
includes the offer too, rather than waiting to find out if it was
inappropriate first...
B.
On 6 June 2011 15:05, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
> I'd say it's pretty inappropriate to post that in reply to a release
> announcement...
>
>
Great work everybody!
On 06.06.2011, at 14:13, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download:
>
> http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html
>
> Changes in this release:
>
> * Native SSL support.
> * Added support for HTTP range req
I'd say it's pretty inappropriate to post that in reply to a release
announcement...
On 06.06.2011, at 16:03, Daniele Testa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I hope it is OK to post job-offers here?
>
> In any case, I am looking for experienced CouchDB admins/developers
> for full time positions with a huge co
Hi,
I hope it is OK to post job-offers here?
In any case, I am looking for experienced CouchDB admins/developers
for full time positions with a huge company in Germany.
If you are interested, please send me your CV and I will get back to
you with more information.
Regards,
Daniele
Whoa!
I owe you a bottle of vodka :)
Cheers,
Fedor.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:12 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download:
> >
> >http://couchdb.apache.org
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download:
>
> http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html
>
> Changes in this release:
>
> * Native SSL support.
> * Added support for HTTP range requests for attachm
Fantastic - & what a sprint that was!
homebrew? check
windows? check
I'm counting nanoseconds on behalf of davisp ... it's not looking too good.
A+
Dave
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 14:13, Robert Newson wrote:
> Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download:
>
> http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html
Great stuff; thanks a bunch for driving this forward!
Cheers,
Dirkjan
No problem, I've got your coffee right here.
B.
On 6 June 2011 13:49, Paul Davis wrote:
>> Your Eternal Servant
>
> Woot! I could use a coffee. Two sugars no milk.
>
> Also, awesome work on releasing 1.1.
>
> Your Eternal Servant
Woot! I could use a coffee. Two sugars no milk.
Also, awesome work on releasing 1.1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13044813#comment-13044813
]
Filipe Manana commented on COUCHDB-1187:
Hi Alexey,
I've observed that behaviou
Hello,
Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 has been released and is available for download:
http://couchdb.apache.org/downloads.html
Changes in this release:
* Native SSL support.
* Added support for HTTP range requests for attachments.
* Added built-in filters for `_changes`: `_doc_ids` and `_desi
40 matches
Mail list logo
