GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/137
CB-8225: Add Unit Tests for platform.js/add function
CB-8225: Add Unit Tests for platform.js/add function
- helps prevent regressions to this function
- helps familiarize with cordova
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/137#issuecomment-68418329
Just realized that this commit changes one of the behaviors I was testing
for:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/commit
Github user omefire closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/137
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/138
CB-8225: Add Unit Tests for platform.js/add function
CB-8225: Add Unit Tests for platform.js/add function :
- Help prevent regressions to add function
- Get feet wet with cordova
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/139
CB-8226 'cordova platform add' : Look up version in config.xml if no
version specified
CB-8226
'cordova platform add' : Look up version in config.xml if no version
Github user omefire closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/139
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140
CB-8226 'cordova platform add' : Look up version in config.xml if no
version specified
CB-8226
'cordova platform add' : Look up version in config.xml if no version
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-68585959
These failures seem unrelated to my changes. Ran the tests again on an
Ubuntu box and all tests pass. I think these failures are intermittent and
sometimes they
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-68743624
Hey @agrieve, I've just addressed your review comments. could you please
take a look again ? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-68909782
Using url.parse introduces additional complexity. Especially, Windows paths
are not going to be handled properly: the drive letter gets omitted after
parsing. This
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-68916510
Done! 'file://' prefix support dropped. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-68942932
Working on it ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-69056950
travis-ci failure not related to my changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-69095149
@agrieve, have you had a chance to take another look at this ? --Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/141#issuecomment-69271082
@hstaudacher, I've added the remaining scenarios.
I've copied over some of the changes you made in this branch and merged
them with mine.
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144
CB-8227 CB8237 CB-8238 Add --save option to 'cordova platform add',
'cordova platform remove' and 'cordova platform update'
CB-8227 CB8237 CB-8238
Add --sa
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/203
CB-8227 CB-8237 CB-8238 Add --save option to 'cordova platform add',
'cordova platform remove' and 'cordova platform update'
CB-8227 CB-8237 CB-8238 Add --save o
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-69377740
@agrieve , I will keep that in mind. Thanks for taking the time to review
this !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/203#issuecomment-69664405
@gorkem , plz review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-69664456
@gorkem , plz review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148
CB-8239 Add support for git urls to 'cordova platform add'
CB-8239 Add support for git urls to 'cordova platform add'
These changes allow the following scenarios:
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r22904360
--- Diff: cordova-lib/spec-cordova/platform.spec.js ---
@@ -354,22 +359,94 @@ describe('add function'
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#issuecomment-70015916
Task for docs update : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8308
I'll probably send another PR for that by the end of the week.
---
If your project i
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r23330721
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/lazy_load.js ---
@@ -284,4 +286,47 @@ function custom(platforms, platform) {
});
}
+// Returns
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r23330749
--- Diff: cordova-lib/spec-cordova/util.spec.js ---
@@ -183,4 +184,138 @@ describe('util module', function() {
expect(res.in
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r23428777
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform.js ---
@@ -71,102 +72,98 @@ function add(hooksRunner, projectRoot, targets, opts) {
// The
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r23488114
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/util.js ---
@@ -262,3 +270,81 @@ function addModuleProperty(module, symbol, modulePath,
opt_wrap, opt_obj
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r23488149
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/util.js ---
@@ -55,6 +61,8 @@ exports.preProcessOptions = preProcessOptions;
exports.addModuleProperty
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#discussion_r23488733
--- Diff: cordova-lib/spec-cordova/lazy_load.spec.js ---
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ var lazy_load = require('../src/cordova/lazy_load'),
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#issuecomment-71293539
Tests are passing locally, so is jshint. I don't know why travis isn't
picking up my changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72096263
working on fixing merge conflicts. will update this once that's done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72536563
@gorkem, I agree with doing the save if config_json has an auto_save
option. that's what I was working on adding, unless you want to take it on. :)
---
If
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72538019
@gorkem I''m planning on adding corresponding PR's for plugins.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/141#issuecomment-72557870
I think we don't need this anymore as the functionality this PR wanted to
introduce has already been included here :
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/c
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#issuecomment-72637685
Hey @agrieve, It seems like the refactoring you did before merging this in
introduced a bug :
Suppose the latest android version is: 3.7.0 and my project
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/159
CB-8406 BugFix: 'cordova platform update' should not be upgrading the pl...
CB-8406:
-'cordova platform update' updates platform to the version in config.xml
inst
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72642865
I have made the following modifications :
- added support for autosave as suggested by Gorkem
- refactored --save feature to blend into the new code
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/148#issuecomment-72642965
Here's a pull request for the fix of the afore-mentionned bug :
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/203#issuecomment-72644631
@jsoref , thanks! space issue fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72743163
related PR: https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/203
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/203#issuecomment-72743227
related PR: https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72790912
appveyor failed because "Build execution time has reached the maximum
allowed time for your plan (40 minutes)."
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-72901151
@agrieve and @gorkem, plz review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-73092239
@agrieve , sorry. I ran into an issue with git refusing to do a rebase :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14410421/git-rebase-merge-conflict-cannot-continue
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-73092687
@purplecabbage , yes there were errors in the tests but those were not
related to these changes and those tests only occasionally fail in appveyor
while travis
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-73156531
Hey @gorkem, the commits have been squashed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-73197538
Hey @gorkem, I just tested 'cordova platform add
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android.git --save', and it works for me. did
you make sure to use
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-73205488
asdf
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/208
CB-8439 Fix 'cordova platform update' documentation to include
CB-8439 Fix 'cordova platform update' documentation to include
You can merge this pull request into a Git r
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/162
CB-8420 'cordova plugin add' should retrieve version, url or local folder
from config.xml if none is specified
CB-8420 'cordova plugin add' should retrieve version, url o
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/162#issuecomment-73615544
@vladimir-kotikov, @agrieve and @gorkem , please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/144#issuecomment-73621340
Hey @gorkem, I'm finalising a PR to remove the save command and add/update
the tests.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/162#issuecomment-73641701
Well, if you review the document we all agreed on, it mentions this. Plus,
this feature is already in for platforms as well. I'm trying to mirror it :
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/162#issuecomment-73651273
@gorkem Also, this feature does not prevent the other one you mentionned.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/162#discussion_r24527527
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/plugin.js ---
@@ -114,6 +116,22 @@ module.exports = function plugin(command, targets,
opts
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74128449
Cool feature list. reviewing this, :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74143188
if no version is specified for (e.g: cordova plugin add
org.apache.cordova.device --save), we end up saving the current edge version
(org.apache.cordova.device
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74145216
I think the 'saving to config.xml' should be moved into a separate function
and called from here. this function is getting way too long to easily reason
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74146324
'saving to config.xml' should happen after the plugin has been installed on
the platforms.
That way, if any error is encountered during the in
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74151061
Hey @gorkem, I notice that --save covers add and remove. Are you going to
send a pull request to handle the update case ? : 'cordova plugin u
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74151973
Hey @gorkem, I notice that --save covers add and remove. Are you going to
send a pull request to handle the update case ? : 'cordova plugin u
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74155732
When the flag --save/autosave on, we should not be retrieving the version
from config.xml.
For example,
- config.xml contains org.apache.cordova.device
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74293656
Also, we should probably save the plugin variables along with the version
into config.xml, so that on prepare/restore, we don't fail.
---
If your project is s
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74313313
hmmm, it seems to me that during prepare, while restoring from config.xml,
we do use variables from config.xml. so, we should save it during
--save/autosave. Please
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-74318530
What if a plugin install fails ? don't we want to continue with other
plugins' install like we do for platforms ?
That way, we also handle platform
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/168
CB-8482: Update engine syntax within config.xml
CB-8482: Update engine syntax within config.xml
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/168#issuecomment-74720162
CB-8482: Update engine syntax within config.xml
- from : ``
- to : ``
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170
CB-8499 `cordova platform save` should save all currently installed
platforms and their versions/git-url/folder-location into config.xml.
CB-8499 `cordova platform save` should save all
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#issuecomment-75298325
@agrieve , @vladimir-kotikov and @gorkem, please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25098780
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform_metadata.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25098622
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform_metadata.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25100140
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform.js ---
@@ -174,6 +181,24 @@ function addHelper(cmd, hooksRunner, projectRoot,
targets, opts
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25100062
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform.js ---
@@ -174,6 +181,24 @@ function addHelper(cmd, hooksRunner, projectRoot,
targets, opts
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#issuecomment-75314035
@vladimir-kotikov Thanks for reviewing, All your reviews have been
addressed, please take another look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/168#issuecomment-75346177
There will need to be another pass to update dependent modules to handle
the possibility that some new code depending on old syntax might have been
inserted in the
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-75574968
Reviewing latest changes ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-75615699
you forgot to negate opts.save as well : if(!autosave && !opts.save && ...)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#issuecomment-75623519
@gorkem, yes platforms.json is a new file in the platforms directory. think
of it as the equivalent of the .fetch.json file we have for plugins.
---
If your
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-75640710
when --save/autosave is on, we should be overriding what's in config.xml,
like we do on the platform side :
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/blob/m
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/166#issuecomment-75656828
what about the other options ? (opts).
shouldn't we pass them along to 'prepare' ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/168#issuecomment-75660844
@gorkem, cool. working on a rebase + update to new dependent modules ...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/168#issuecomment-75669608
@gorkem, I did find some things that needed to be updated in
restore-util.js. those have been taken care of.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#issuecomment-75670437
I think this PR is ready to be merged in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/173
CB-8578 BugFix: 'cordova plugin should be able to restore urls and
folders in addition to versions.
CB-8578 BugFix: 'cordova plugin should be able to restore urls and
folders in a
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174
CB-8577 BugFix 'cordova plugin add --save' should properly save
variables into config.xml to enable restoring later on.
CB-8577 BugFix 'cordova plugin add --save'
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76512869
What do you mean ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76532251
@gorkem , I disagree with your statement that it does not affect
functionality. As it currently stands, the code doesn't work for plugins that
have variable
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76532764
It currently doesn't work in 100% of the cases but I do agree we can
postpone the fix.
I don't really care what the name of the element
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76533060
It currently doesn't work in 100% of the cases but I do agree we can
postpone the fix.
It doesn't really matter what the name of the element
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76641117
Fixing it in Config.getFeature(id) would mean that we would have to
differentiate between `` types : variables and non-variables. I think
that could be unecessarily
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76641530
Fixing it in Config.getFeature(id) would mean that we would have to
differentiate between `` types : variables and non-variables. I think
that would be unecessarily
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/commit/4c0fec7d30df238cfc4c834a4235b2c8fcf330ad#commitcomment-9979467
@gorkem, this change introduces another bug : the variables list now
contains all the `` such as 'id', 'url
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/174#issuecomment-76663106
@gorkem, the change you've committed to fix this issue (
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/commit/4c0fec7d30df238cfc4c834a4235b2c8fcf330ad
) introduces an
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25626517
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform_metadata.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25626571
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform_metadata.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user omefire commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#discussion_r25652223
--- Diff: cordova-lib/src/cordova/platform_metadata.js ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/**
+Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/170#issuecomment-77011164
@agrieve , I addressed your comments. could you please take another look ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user omefire opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/177
CB-8596 Expose APIs to retrieve platforms and plugins saved in config.xml
CB-8596 Expose APIs to retrieve platforms and plugins saved in config.xml
so as to abstract clients away from the
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/177#issuecomment-77107166
After migrating platforms & plugins to package.json, This implementation
will be updated, but clients will remain unchanged.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/177#issuecomment-77107191
@agrieve , @stevengill please review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
1 - 100 of 629 matches
Mail list logo
