Yes, it was a "for example" hypothetical.
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Senior Technology Evangelist
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 19 February 2014 09:11, Ian Clelland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 19,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
> >
> > In all cases only PMC votes are binding, although it is good community
> > practice to acknowledge all votes. So, for example, if there are 2
> binding
> > -1's, one non-binding -
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
>
> In all cases only PMC votes are binding, although it is good community
> practice to acknowledge all votes. So, for example, if there are 2 binding
> -1's, one non-binding -1 and 3 binding +1's an RM can choose to ignore or
> support the non
This illustrates one of the problems of a <72 hour window. It is a social
guideline that tries to ensure everyone has a chance to have their say.
That being said there are other ways of managing community interest. Since
anyone (including a non-committer) can cut a release and call for a vote it
i
Mark answers your question well. I agree with his assertion. I'll restate
it for (hopefully added) clarity.
The goal is to avoid getting bogged down in votes and rule by committee.
Ultimately, the one doing the work gets to make the decision. So, for
release votes (and other majority consensus vot
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 19/02/2014 12:31, Ian Clelland wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Ross Gardler <
> rgard...@opendirective.com>wrote:
> >
> >> It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
> >> VOTE thread at a time where
On 19/02/2014 12:31, Ian Clelland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>
>> It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
>> VOTE thread at a time where the Cordova project is being asked to improve
>> their release processes. So as to avoid a
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
> VOTE thread at a time where the Cordova project is being asked to improve
> their release processes. So as to avoid a potentially bad experience during
> this vote I wan
It's unfortunate that there are a couple of -1's on the current release
VOTE thread at a time where the Cordova project is being asked to improve
their release processes. So as to avoid a potentially bad experience during
this vote I want to ensure the community is aware of the voting guidelines
fo
