Jeff, thanks for the valuable recap!
That is exactly the difference I was talking about. I would propose that
> instead of native placing the file there, we just make it a final part of
> the build step. Just as we've done with other CLI tasks, make a micro
> cordova script to do it, and have it c
Or we put the version in the filename.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jesse MacFadyen wrote:
> Interesting journey, Jeffery.
> What if instead of linking from www/index.html to www/cordova.js, we
> put the js in the app root above www?
>
> Or:
Interesting journey, Jeffery.
What if instead of linking from www/index.html to www/cordova.js, we
put the js in the app root above www?
Or:
Tl;dr I'd like to propose a different but similar solution based on the
evolution of WebWorks. That we automatically inject cordova.js into a
specific place in the app (say the root since thats where cordova_plugins
is) and then the developer simply adds a script tag to the correct
location account
+1 cordova.js with version as a header comment
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Benn Mapes wrote:
> +1 for sure
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
>
> > +1!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Jesse wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > @purplecabbage
> > > risingj
+1 for sure
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Anis KADRI wrote:
> +1!
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Jesse wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > @purplecabbage
> > risingj.com
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Shazron wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54
+1!
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Jesse wrote:
> +1
>
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Shazron wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, James Jong
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 Cleaner. Thanks Andrew!
> > >
> > > -James Jong
> > >
> > > On
+1
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Shazron wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, James Jong wrote:
>
> > +1 Cleaner. Thanks Andrew!
> >
> > -James Jong
> >
> > On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Lorin Beer
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > duplicated informatio
+1
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:54 PM, James Jong wrote:
> +1 Cleaner. Thanks Andrew!
>
> -James Jong
>
> On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Lorin Beer wrote:
>
> > +1
> > duplicated information is a good redundancy to remove
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> >
> >>
+1 Cleaner. Thanks Andrew!
-James Jong
On Apr 30, 2013, at 3:31 PM, Lorin Beer wrote:
> +1
> duplicated information is a good redundancy to remove
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
>
>> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having
>> a sta
+1
duplicated information is a good redundancy to remove
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having
> a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end.
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
Great! I'll make it happen :)
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3307
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having
> a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end.
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM,
Sounds good. FTR we did it for issue tracking not arbitrarily. Having
a stamp at the top of the file fulfills the same end.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
> in after the lib name in the JS filename was
Subject: Re: Naming: cordova-2.8.0.js --> cordova.js
+1 cordova.js with version as a header comment
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
> in after the lib name in the JS filename was wh
+1 nice and clean
On Apr 30, 2013, at 2:36 PM, Michael Brooks wrote:
> +1 cordova.js with version as a header comment
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
>
>> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
>> in after the lib name in the JS file
+1 cordova.js with version as a header comment
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
> in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did"
> aka jQuery.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> On 4/30/13 11
If I recall correctly the original reason was because putting the version
in after the lib name in the JS filename was what "other libraries did"
aka jQuery.
+1 from me.
On 4/30/13 11:24 AM, "tommy-carlos Williams" wrote:
>+1
>
>Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too?
>
>On 01/05/2013, at 4:
+1
Wouldn't this make mobile spec easier too?
On 01/05/2013, at 4:20, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> This has been brought up a few times, but I'm not sure there's been a
> decisive answer here yet...
>
> iOS now uses "cordova.ios.js"
> Android uses "cordova.android.js", but renames it in a build step
18 matches
Mail list logo
