Filip Maj wrote:
> In the past, at some point we decided to stop supporting BB OS 5 and 4.6,
> and removed those Cordova implementations. Just wanted to raise the idea
> of doing something similar for OS 7 and PlayBook once those two platforms
> get to the same level of usage.
I believe that we're
Some important criteria in my mind:
- are there recent contributions, and active contributors?
- is there a getting-started guide, and are quirks for existing APIs
documented?
- is there a jira component that people can submit defects under?
Ultimately I don't see value in defining things any furt
Yup
On Sunday, January 6, 2013, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> trying to understand, you mean the label of core vs whatever is
> meaningless but you do like having a baseline set of reqs for the
> impl?
>
> On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Dave Johnson
> wrote:
> > I don't think it's good to be prescripti
trying to understand, you mean the label of core vs whatever is
meaningless but you do like having a baseline set of reqs for the
impl?
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Dave Johnson wrote:
> I don't think it's good to be prescriptive about what a platform is - code
> and tests (based around that l
I don't think it's good to be prescriptive about what a platform is - code
and tests (based around that list of things @brian mentioned plus the
plugin API) should determine what a platform is.
If someone wants to contribute code and tests to create a platform they
should be able to do so. There a
Ok. So I removed 'sunrise', updated the definition text to include
what was discussed here, and moved Bada to sunset.
I noticed Windows 8 made its way into our core platforms without any
mention in this thread. I have no objection to this, though I'm not
sure it implements the entirety of the defi
+1 for bada removal from core platforms. Samsung is not even working on it
anymore. "We're focused on Tizen" is what their marketing people told me
last time I asked them about it.
I think we should ship only platforms that matter (i.e platforms that
appear on Analyst's market share numbers) and do
>Think its still good to make this distinction even though our scope is
>going to drastically reduce (in a sense). The benefit of these labels
>is to indicate how much involvement developers using Cordova can
>expect the Cordova platform to maintain.
>
>Core platforms target an operating system, w
Think its still good to make this distinction even though our scope is
going to drastically reduce (in a sense). The benefit of these labels
is to indicate how much involvement developers using Cordova can
expect the Cordova platform to maintain.
Core platforms target an operating system, with dev
Yeah, there is a bit of work happening in Open webOS right now... We've got
ports to the Galaxy Nexus and Nexus 7 hardware that are actively being
worked on by the community, and we've also got some x86 hardware working
with the webOS runtime environment being hosted on Ubuntu and then
there's
Its certainly up for debate, while webOS still is out there it is not
shipping on any devices, nor has it for a couple of years.
However, we are seeing an interesting trend towards web operating
systems: chrome, windows, firefox, and tizen. This puts webOS in some
good company and given the trend
WebOS still gets distributed unlike Symbian.
-Steve
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Leutwyler, Markus
wrote:
> Should we put Open webOS/webOS back to the Core Platforms since Cordova's
> importance is publicly documented?
>
> See
> http://blog.openwebosproject.org/post/39278618299/javascript-app
Should we put Open webOS/webOS back to the Core Platforms since Cordova's
importance is publicly documented?
See
http://blog.openwebosproject.org/post/39278618299/javascript-apps-for-open-webos-with-enyo-and-cordova
Markus
-Original Message-
From: Filip Maj [mailto:f...@adobe.com]
Sen
.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 5:36 PM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Review of Core Platforms
>
> Certainly, if RIM can provide some % numbers of people using each OS,
> that'd be helpful! Kind of like the Android OS pie chart breakdown of
> u
aj [f...@adobe.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 5:36 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Review of Core Platforms
Certainly, if RIM can provide some % numbers of people using each OS,
that'd be helpful! Kind of like the Android OS pie chart breakdown of
users across different OS ver
Certainly, if RIM can provide some % numbers of people using each OS,
that'd be helpful! Kind of like the Android OS pie chart breakdown of
users across different OS versions.
In the past, at some point we decided to stop supporting BB OS 5 and 4.6,
and removed those Cordova implementations. Just
What does "schedule for removal mean"? Perhaps we can tie removal to some
specific metric that we might be able to assist with? BB7 will remain a fairly
large base of devices for a while, particularly in emerging markets and
enterprise, where I think we will continue to see a large focus on we
17 matches
Mail list logo
