+1
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Do it!
> On Jun 1, 2015 7:28 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote:
>
> > sgtm!
> >
> > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Dmitry Blotsky
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Right now coho stores rat excludes inside it
Do it!
On Jun 1, 2015 7:28 AM, "Andrew Grieve" wrote:
> sgtm!
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Dmitry Blotsky
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Right now coho stores rat excludes inside its source code, which often
> > goes out of date and we end up with a lot of noise in "coho
> > audit-licens
sgtm!
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Dmitry Blotsky
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Right now coho stores rat excludes inside its source code, which often
> goes out of date and we end up with a lot of noise in "coho
> audit-license-headers”. Do you think it would be a good idea to instead add
> a “.rati
Hi all,
Right now coho stores rat excludes inside its source code, which often goes out
of date and we end up with a lot of noise in "coho audit-license-headers”. Do
you think it would be a good idea to instead add a “.ratignore” file in each
repo, much like .npmignore and .gitignore?
Kindly,
