On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 7:42 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 12/11/2017 02:21 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > Hi ComDev, quick question: [1] suggests committers should be signed up
> for
> > the private mailing list. However, [2] indicates it's a PMC-only mailing
> > list. The latter makes more sense, si
On 12/11/2017 02:21 PM, Christopher wrote:
Hi ComDev, quick question: [1] suggests committers should be signed up for
the private mailing list. However, [2] indicates it's a PMC-only mailing
list. The latter makes more sense, since voting on committers to join the
PMC could result in a socially
I agree it does not make sense for committers to be requested to
subscribe to private@ unless they are also PMC members.
It should probably reference the dev@ list instead.
On 7 March 2018 at 22:51, Christopher wrote:
> I never got a response to this inquiry. I think the docs are still
> inconsi
I never got a response to this inquiry. I think the docs are still
inconsistent.
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 2:21 PM Christopher wrote:
> Hi ComDev, quick question: [1] suggests committers should be signed up for
> the private mailing list. However, [2] indicates it's a PMC-only mailing
> list. The
