I agree; I see CouchDB is listed on the home page: maybe that list is
builded manually and not using doap files
On 5 May 2013 02:39, Noah Slater wrote:
> I get the impression that they're both generated from the same source. i.e.
> They will always have 100% parity. Any missing projects, like
I get the impression that they're both generated from the same source. i.e.
They will always have 100% parity. Any missing projects, like CouchDB are
going to be missing from both files.
On 4 May 2013 22:35, Davide Galletti wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 14:39, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> How did you ascer
On 04/05/2013 14:39, Noah Slater wrote:
How did you ascertain this?
I don't think CouchDB has a DOAP file, as we're not listed on
http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html for instance.
I compared
http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html
to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrast
On 23 April 2013 10:56, Davide Galletti wrote:
> It turned out that no projects are missing a DOAP file;
How did you ascertain this?
I don't think CouchDB has a DOAP file, as we're not listed on
http://projects.apache.org/indexes/quick.html for instance.
--
NS
It turned out that no projects are missing a DOAP file; I have had
problems parsing
a couple of files; they seem not to be valid RDFs according to
http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/
http://forrest.apache.org/doap.xml
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/site/trunk/uima-website/docs/doap/
It would be excellent if you could encourage projects without a DOAP file
to create one. In fact all top level Apache projects should have one as per
our branding requirements [1] which state:
"All projects must provide a DOAP - Description Of A Project - file or
entry for both the project itself
