Lgtm!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jun 8, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06/06/2016 05:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>> >
>> >> The challenge with a CoC is know
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 1:49 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>
> On 06/06/2016 05:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> >> The challenge with a CoC is knowing when to quit before becoming the
> >> thought police. Also, it should be things that are measu
On 06/06/2016 05:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>> The challenge with a CoC is knowing when to quit before becoming the
>> thought police. Also, it should be things that are measurable and
>> enforceable. I don't think this is either.
>>
>> W
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> The challenge with a CoC is knowing when to quit before becoming the
> thought police. Also, it should be things that are measurable and
> enforceable. I don't think this is either.
>
> What you are suggesting is really good advice, but isn't so
On 06/06/2016 01:16, Rich Bowen wrote:
> The challenge with a CoC is knowing when to quit before becoming the
> thought police. Also, it should be things that are measurable and
> enforceable. I don't think this is either.
>
> What you are suggesting is really good advice, but isn't something we c
+1
This is not really a CoC issue, more of a best practice one.
Sent from my Windows 10 phone
From: Rich Bowen<mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 5:17 PM
To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct - Over Respo
The challenge with a CoC is knowing when to quit before becoming the
thought police. Also, it should be things that are measurable and
enforceable. I don't think this is either.
What you are suggesting is really good advice, but isn't something we can
enforce with policy.
On Jun 5, 2016 8:00 PM, "
On 3/26/15 1:46 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Oh, thanks for the input Shane!
>
> I don't want to make the punitive measures stuff too complex. It should be
> simple and easy to understand for both those who want protection from
> harassment and so on, and those who've been spoken to about adjusting th
*or where ever
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 at 18:46 Noah Slater wrote:
> Oh, thanks for the input Shane!
>
> I don't want to make the punitive measures stuff too complex. It should be
> simple and easy to understand for both those who want protection from
> harassment and so on, and those who've been sp
Oh, thanks for the input Shane!
I don't want to make the punitive measures stuff too complex. It should be
simple and easy to understand for both those who want protection from
harassment and so on, and those who've been spoken to about adjusting their
conduct.
A strikes system is one idea. So in
On 3/25/15 12:00 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Yep, thanks for the reply. I'm not sure how to handle the governance side
> of this. But I'm sure we can come to an agreement on this list soon.
Discussing here makes sense; it's public and there are plenty of helpful
voices that are likely to participate;
Yep, thanks for the reply. I'm not sure how to handle the governance side
of this. But I'm sure we can come to an agreement on this list soon.
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 at 15:13 jan i wrote:
> On 25 March 2015 at 13:08, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Jan,
> >
> > Late to the party here, sorry. But I wanna
On 25 March 2015 at 13:08, Noah Slater wrote:
> Jan,
>
> Late to the party here, sorry. But I wanna reply to your point that the CoC
> is not meant to be enforceable.
>
> That is not the case, as I understand it. Indeed, an unenforceable or
> not-regularly-enforced CoC is not worthless, it's actu
Jan,
Late to the party here, sorry. But I wanna reply to your point that the CoC
is not meant to be enforceable.
That is not the case, as I understand it. Indeed, an unenforceable or
not-regularly-enforced CoC is not worthless, it's actually *harmful* and
dangerous for marginalised people in our
Hi
this is a whimsical post. (also a top post)
But here’s a cute code of conduct video.
http://goo.gl/UZF7CW
> On 20 Dec 2014, at 15:14, jan i wrote:
>
> On 20 December 2014 at 20:55, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>> On 20 Dec 2014, at 09:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>
>>> This is gre
On 20 December 2014 at 20:55, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
> Hi,
> > On 20 Dec 2014, at 09:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >
> > This is great and, as noted, long overdue. Although the code
> > itself "simply" codifies what had been the tribal knowledge
> > of the ASF, and how we'd expected people to be
Patches are welcome but please consider the document RTC, with the R
happening on this list. Thanks.
On Dec 20, 2014 6:34 AM, "sebb" wrote:
> There are some useful links in the CoC blog:
>
> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/asf_publishes_long_overdue_code
>
> For example,
> Ashe Dryden's
Hi,
> On 20 Dec 2014, at 09:50, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> This is great and, as noted, long overdue. Although the code
> itself "simply" codifies what had been the tribal knowledge
> of the ASF, and how we'd expected people to behave, NOT having
> it written down was pretty sad.
>
> Thx to all fo
Tom Eddie Pedersen
blikkenslager.t...@hotmail.com
Mobiltelefon 45041027
Adresse:
Solendvegen 320
5936 Manger
- Reply message -
Fra: "Jim Jagielski"
Til:
Emne: Code of Conduct - links to why they are needed etc
Dato: lør., des. 20, 2014 15:52
This is great and, as noted, long overdue
This is great and, as noted, long overdue. Although the code
itself "simply" codifies what had been the tribal knowledge
of the ASF, and how we'd expected people to behave, NOT having
it written down was pretty sad.
Thx to all for making it happen.
> On Dec 20, 2014, at 6:33 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
Late to this thread, but huge +1 from me. Thanks Rich!!
I have some additional things to contribute, but I'll start new
threads for them soon enough! (Feel free to nudge me if I seem to have
forgotten.)
On 18 November 2014 at 14:53, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As many of you are no doubt aware, we have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18/11/14 14:53, Rich Bowen wrote:
> I honestly can't figure out why we didn't just do this years ago,
> other than expecting that someone else would.
Thanks for "biting the bullet" and just do it, Rich! A big +1 to this
code of conduct.
- --
Met
On 11/18/2014 09:46 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Christopher wrote:
>
>> At first glance, a big +1. This is one of the better Code of Conduct
>> policies that I've seen.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 18
Published. Thanks!
Uli
On 2014-11-18 21:37, Rob Vesse wrote:
> Great work Rich
>
> The community.apache.org site has a specific question on this in the
> Newbie FAQ (http://community.apache.org/newbiefaq.html) which just points
> to the wiki currently. I have made an edit that points to the new
Great work Rich
The community.apache.org site has a specific question on this in the
Newbie FAQ (http://community.apache.org/newbiefaq.html) which just points
to the wiki currently. I have made an edit that points to the newly
published document but I don't have write permissions to publish the
u
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Christopher wrote:
> At first glance, a big +1. This is one of the better Code of Conduct
> policies that I've seen.
>
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> > As many of you are n
At first glance, a big +1. This is one of the better Code of Conduct
policies that I've seen.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As many of you are no doubt aware, we have had on our website, for at
> least 8 years, and,
+1000
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 8:46 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Code of conduct
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Rich Bowen wrote
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> ...So, without further ado:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html ...
w00t indeed, thanks!
-Bertrand
w00t :)
On 11/18/2014 3:53 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As many of you are no doubt aware, we have had on our website, for at
> least 8 years, and, I think probably much longer, "Code of conduct,
> coming soon!" Long enough, in fact, that I had completely forgotten
> about it.
>
> It was brought to my
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Here at Apache projects are free to define their own code of conduct.
>
For womAn@, if ever it be a project, anon code would begin:
"the timing of our actions are the window to our soul: know here the sound
of one hand clapping"
(thanks Ros
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> I just added a FAQ item to the comdev site about code of conduct for ASF
> projects...
http://community.apache.org/newbiefaq.html looks good to me, thanks!
-Bertrand
32 matches
Mail list logo
