On 18.01.2015 18:10, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> After all git is born out of dissatisfaction with svn, but Linus wrote the
> tool instead of simply publicly whinging about his hatred for svn.
You mean, "as well as," not "instead of." :)
-- Brane
I've seen this discussion a hundred times or so at Apache, whether it's forums
issue trackers or version control. The story is always the same: a handful of
software artisans want full uncompromising control over their toolchain. Half
the time as is true here what they want is already function
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 11:19 AM, jan i wrote:
> On 18 January 2015 at 16:48, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) <
> ross.gard...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>> There are many reasons why the ASF requires projects to use its own
>> servers for some items. For example, we couldn't use GitHub until we had
>> b
I speak with new people (like myself), most people find the principle
of our rules very good and needed, but not the mixing of rule and tool.
just my 2ct.
rgds
jan i.
> Sent from my Windows Phone
>
> From: Jay Vyas<mailto:jayunit100.apa...@gmail.com>
Phone
From: Jay Vyas<mailto:jayunit100.apa...@gmail.com>
Sent: 1/18/2015 7:37 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org<mailto:dev@community.apache.org>
Subject: Mailing lists, sites, ...
Hi Apache .
Every so often we get the question come up: does Apache infra allow/support
. The an
Hi Apache .
Every so often we get the question come up: does Apache infra allow/support
. The answer is sometimes "not yet" and related to the fact that there are
100s of projects that require uniformity at Apache, and it would be chaos of
every new project was allowed a new infrastructure
