Thanks Justin, yes the person voting -1 had a concern that the ACS doesn't
end up having repositories that don't get any participation/development.
It's mitigated by the fact that there are contributors who have shown
interest and want to maintain, develop and release under ACS. They also
confirmed
Hi,
> Thanks for replying, are you with ASF legal?
I help out there (and currently assistant VP), but I’m not a lawyer or anything
like that.
> Hashicorp CTO and their management agreed over email, which I could forward
> over our public lists or ask them to send a confirmation on the voting
Hi Justin,
Thanks for replying, are you with ASF legal?
Hashicorp CTO and their management agreed over email, which I could forward
over our public lists or ask them to send a confirmation on the voting
thread. I think the codebase is owned by a company (Hashicorp), do we need
the company to agre
Hi,
The MPL license is not compatible with the ALv2. Do you have a link to where
they agreed to change the license? Did all of the previous contributors the
code agree to the license change?
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
Dear ASF Legal, ASF com-dev, cc Apache CloudStack PMC,
The Apache CloudStack (ACS) project recently voted [1][2] to continue
further development of an archived 3rd party project:
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack
We discovered that the original codebase is licensed under
