We are very sorry. We asked our contact at Google, which unfortunately
replied that it is too late:
> No, I'm sorry, there's nothing we can do about it now. The student should
> have contacted us about this before the applications closed this year.
Just a thought:
Is there any chance your propo
Hello Uli,
Is there anything we can do about this?
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Sarang Shrivastava
wrote:
> Hello all,
> I accidentally made a blunder while submitting my Gsoc 2k15 proposal. The
> proposal was meant for "rspamd" but accidentally got posted with Apache
> Software Foundation.
Hello all,
I accidentally made a blunder while submitting my Gsoc 2k15 proposal. The
proposal was meant for "rspamd" but accidentally got posted with Apache
Software Foundation.
The link to my proposal is "
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/student/google/gsoc2015/xlr_24/56294995
.
Please consider me for your project in GSOC 2015.
Regards
Umang Agarwal
hello everyone,
i'm checking out it's(stratos cli) REST api. and can i get more info about
the project.
1. is it a client side application or a micro service?
2. if it is client side, i have seen that there's lot of information for a
command line client. are most of the details are default??
3. can
It's not too late, just add the project ideas to the COMDEV project in JIRA.
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-02-27 16:14, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it too late to add potential projects to this years (2015) list of
> Apache GSOC ideas? Taverna (http://taverna.incubator.apache.org/) is a
> relativel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
Is it too late to add potential projects to this years (2015) list of
Apache GSOC ideas? Taverna (http://taverna.incubator.apache.org/) is a
relatively new Apache incubator project and we don't have an live
Apache JIRA yet so we can't add ide
nity.apache.org"
Subject: Re: GSoC 2015 - very little interest so far
>Hi Alex,
>
>My email went to private@incubator with the explicit request to forward
>it to podlings. I'll re-send
>it to the general list hoping that it doesn't drown in the flood of
>emails there.
Ah, disregard my email, I see that you answered later in the thread!
Thanks
Richard.
On 13 February 2015 at 09:33, Richard Downer wrote:
> Uli,
>
> Can incubator podlings participate? As a we don't have a PMC (instead,
> a PPMC) we didn't receive your mail but I think this could be a good
> oppo
Uli,
Can incubator podlings participate? As a we don't have a PMC (instead,
a PPMC) we didn't receive your mail but I think this could be a good
opportunity for our project.
Cheers,
Richard.
On 11 February 2015 at 22:18, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> the original email went bcc p...@apac
Simply label a new or existing JIRA issue with gsoc2015.
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-02-12 23:07, Pierre Smits wrote:
> Hi Ulrich,
>
> How do they record their registration? Is it simply registering a JIRA
> describing the intend or goal and tagging it with GSoC 2015?
>
> Best re
Hi Ulrich,
How do they record their registration? Is it simply registering a JIRA
describing the intend or goal and tagging it with GSoC 2015?
Best regards,
Pierre
Op woensdag 11 februari 2015 heeft Ulrich Stärk het
volgende geschreven:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> the original email w
Hi Alex,
My email went to private@incubator with the explicit request to forward it to
podlings. I'll re-send
it to the general list hoping that it doesn't drown in the flood of emails
there.
Cheers,
Uli
On 2015-02-11 12:12, Alex B. wrote:
> There also might be a lot of issues "submitted" in
Hi Pierre,
the original email went bcc p...@apache.org so all PMCs should be aware of the
programme.
Great to hear that there is interest within Directory and OpenMeetings. There
are however no ideas
on our list from those two projects. It would be great if you could remind them
to record them
There also might be a lot of issues "submitted" in the last minute before
the deadline, as it happens with talk for ApacheCon CFP,
I.e by new projects from the Incubator who are interested but are just
starting they ASF journey and did not have much time to prepare beforehand
this year (like Zeppel
Hi Ulrich,
Don't know whether your call for action was also sent to PMC Members of the
projects (via private@), but there is interest in Apache Directory and
Apache OpenMeetings.
For Apache Directory interest, have a look at:
http://directory.markmail.org/message/fgvejt7gncwheyki
For Apache OpenM
Uli
Just did a quick run through for the Jena project, I found we had a bunch
of things labelled as gsoc but not as gsoc2015
In general there seems to be lots of open issues in JIRA which are
labelled gsoc and not labelled gsoc2015
http://s.apache.org/open-gsoc-not-2015
There are a few project
Hi Folks,
Our ideas list for GSoC projects [1] so far has only 38 entries. IMO this
number is extremely low
given the number of projects at Apache. I conclude that interest in GSoC this
year is either very
low or that my initial email has not reached the right people.
Please help me spread the
Hi
Do you have specific apache project in mind?
there will be several projects submitting proposals (including a new one
which I work on, Corinthia which can use a C programmer)
I think the best to do is to engage with a project.
rgds
jan i
On Sunday, December 14, 2014, TUSHAR SONI wrote:
>
Hi,
I want to contribute in Apache in next year's Gsoc2015. I know C/C++ and JS
but don't know how to getting started with this project. So can anyone help
me for further progress.
Thanks!!
Best Regards,
Tushar
As stated elsewhere, I’ve never seen Google’s request to „vouch“ for an
organization as the organization vouching but rather veteran org admins
vouching for the org admins, mentors and processes of an organization new to
GSoC.
If I happen to be at this year’s mentor summit I’ll raise this point
In my opinion, Google is making an incoherent request. What does it
mean for one organization to vouch for another? What, specifically,
does Google think that the ASF could, as a Foundation, know about
Terasology? If Google were to publish something very specific and
concrete about this, perhaps it
I'm involved with another organization, Terasology --
http://terasology.org/, that submitted a GSOC proposal for the second
year in a row. According to the six Terasology representatives at
the GSOC 2014 post-mortem IRC meeting with rejected organizations,
Terasology was denied this year mainly d
23 matches
Mail list logo
