And please let's not forget either that *money makes no sense whatsoever*.
Cheers
PS: It looks like JavaX will be sponsored in the 7 digits range ($, that
is).
Am 01.10.2015 11:12 schrieb "sebb" :
> On 1 October 2015 at 08:19, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardle
On 1 October 2015 at 08:19, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler
> wrote:
>> This whole process is nonsense
>
> In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except
> for all of the others)
>
>>
>> What is important is what economic value does the co
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Ross Gardler
wrote:
> This whole process is nonsense
In general I agree - CoCoMo is the worst model for valuation (except
for all of the others)
>
> What is important is what economic value does the code produce. If we look at
> it that way I'd say our code (and
over 50% of the web - what's the value of the web?
Ross
-Original Message-
From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 8:59 AM
To: dev@community.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: A $5B Value: The Code in Linux Foundation Collaborative
Projects
Hi Daniel.
I know
Hi Daniel.
I know that David gave a keynote (was there) with the numbers you mention,
but I imaged making it more "official" like this report, so we have
something to sponsors and other interested.
We need to promote ASF, and this could be one way of doing it.
rgds
jan I.
On 30 September 20
Hi Jan,
We actually did the math last year for ACEU 2014, I'll try to find it
for you.
But in short, take the LF number, multiply it by 1.25 and you sort of
get to the figures we were discussing back then.
This is highly subjective and not in any way an _actual_ science
(neither are the LF numb
Hi.
This report is real interesting reading, it could be real cool to do the
same math for ASF.
Is anybody interested in forming a small work team (a LABS project), and
try to do the calculation for ASF ?
rgds
jan I.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Linux Foundation
Date: 30 Sep
