I think the updates are now all done.
If there are any issues, please report them so they can be fixed.
On 27 January 2015 at 16:01, sebb wrote:
> Thanks very much - those look fine to me.
>
> I'll commit them and update the references.
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 15:39, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
Thanks very much - those look fine to me.
I'll commit them and update the references.
On 27 January 2015 at 15:39, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> http://imgur.com/a/s2uRb
>
> Good enough?
>
> With regards,
> Daniel.
>
>
> On 2015-01-27 16:22, sebb wrote:
>>
>> As I noted at the time, those are not the
http://imgur.com/a/s2uRb
Good enough?
With regards,
Daniel.
On 2015-01-27 16:22, sebb wrote:
As I noted at the time, those are not the correct sizes for the website.
The normal ones are 125x125 pixels and 234x60.
The Flikr ones are 800x255 which will break the page layouts.
Also, the Flik
As I noted at the time, those are not the correct sizes for the website.
The normal ones are 125x125 pixels and 234x60.
The Flikr ones are 800x255 which will break the page layouts.
Also, the Flikr images don't have any detail on them apart from "North America"
Previous ones had dates and loca
The email you responded to on 12/15 had a link to images on flickr
https://flic.kr/p/ptyZ5L
https://flic.kr/p/q8ZBLQ
But hopefully we'll have alternates later this week.
On Jan 26, 2015 5:10 PM, "sebb" wrote:
> On 26 January 2015 at 14:04, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > Here are the new logos. I sent t
On 26 January 2015 at 14:04, Rich Bowen wrote:
> Here are the new logos. I sent them to the list some time ago, but didn't
> get them into the right place it appears.
No sign of logos attached to the copy of the mail I have received.
Nor can I see any attachment in the copy in the mail-archives.
Here are the new logos. I sent them to the list some time ago, but
didn't get them into the right place it appears.
Getting ready to go to FOSDEM, so I'm not sure if I'll get to this
today. If someone beats me to it, that would be wonderful.
On 01/21/2015 07:18 PM, sebb wrote:
On 22 Januar
On 22 January 2015 at 00:08, David Crossley wrote:
> (I am not sure where this belongs, so starting here.
> Would someone else please handle it, as i do not have the time.)
>
> Many Apache project websites refer directly to the
> "current event" information, so that their websites will
> automatic
