support.tidelift.com/hc/en-us/articles/4406309657876-Lifter-agreement
>>>>
>>>> Our hope is that this removes a barrier between maintainers of ASF-hosted
>>>> projects and receiving income from downstream users through Tidelift to
>>>> support work which mi
How does it pull them? While Logging Services doesn’t have a logo Log4j does
but isn’t there.
Ralph
> On Aug 19, 2022, at 8:03 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> On 19/08/2022 17.02, Sharan Foga wrote:
>> Excellent and thanks Daniel. This is exactly what I am looking for.
>> Just for info - is this r
My experience with vendors that employee people to work on ASF projects is that
they have their own internal processes that are separate from the ASF’s. For
example,
as part of their product they might deliver Apache Foo for Acme Bar. The
version they
ship might not exactly match what the ASF
You are still confusing how individuals in ASF projects can work with Tidelift
(or vice versa) vs why anyone would pay them. I don’t care why people pay
Tidelift nor do I see a reason I should have to. The fact that you see no added
value doesn’t mean people won’t pay them, even if it is just so
older),
> I do not see what's the added value of Tidelift. Seems like unnecessary
> intermediary.
>
> J.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:10 PM Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>> First, I would like to clarify Gary’s email as I don’t think he
>> characterized it
First, I would like to clarify Gary’s email as I don’t think he characterized
it quite correctly.
The Logging PMC concluded we could not be part of an arrangement with TideLift
and
that the issues needed to be worked out at the foundation level. The primary
issue was
that TideLift had require
ree to do
> that - with similar conditions.
>
> J.
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 4:56 PM Sam Ruby wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 4:50 PM Ralph Goers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> Recently the Logging Servic
> On Jan 12, 2022, at 8:34 AM, Mohammad Noureldin
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have 2 questions:
> 1- How did that work in the case of Apache Struts ? Any details can be
> shared ?
In the case of Struts it appears there is only a single active committer and he
is the sole
person receiving funds
ving the ASF
>>> and/or the project involved at any level should be disallowed.
>>>
>>> We cannot also ignore the obvious self-serving nature of the request by
>>> Tidelift and if we are comfortable with them using this as an opportunity
>>> for promotion.
>&
Hello all,
Recently the Logging Services PMC was approached by Tidelift offering to
provide monetary support either to the project or individual committers. To
obtain that sponsorship the project has to agree to the terms at
https://support.tidelift.com/hc/en-us/articles/4406309657876-Lifter-ag
10 matches
Mail list logo
