On 07/11/2017 06:21 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 07/11/2017 03:41 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
I still think the name sucks, in the end IIUC it's not much more
than "code review notifications" which can be useful to have.
Sure. And if it's used well, it could be great. But names are
powerful th
On 07/10/2017 06:03 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
On 07/07/2017 09:39 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
I think "CODEOWNERS" is too strong a term; they should have been more
descriptive with CODEREVIEWERS or the like, since these aren't
necessarily owners of a file or project. That might be useful feedback
for
On 12/20/2016 09:51 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I (and maybe others) want to eliminate the argument that the response rate
was too low to be used to draw conclusions.
I agree; this was one of my first thoughts when I saw the survey
response rate.
--Jacob
-
I think I agree with both of you...
On 12/05/2016 09:41 PM, Ulrich Stärk wrote:
I have seen way too many metrics being misused to justify the wrong actions
...measuring the wrong thing at the wrong time or in the wrong way can
be *extremely* harmful, yes...
On 12/05/2016 01:07 PM, Daniel Gr
On 12/05/2016 08:15 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Perhaps ComDev can act like a prpject visitor. (Not auditor or inspector!)
"No one expects the ComDev Inquisition!!"
We can make a wiki page with a randomised list of all ASF projects, a quick
checklist (smaller than maturity model) and just
On 09/21/2016 03:25 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
http://producingoss.com/ might be a good fit.
This was the book that immediately came to mind for me, as well.
--Jacob
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@community.apache
