> On Nov 1, 2024, at 1:13 PM, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
>
> I think Christopher nailed it. Now when I think of it the difference is
> that consensus is **not** a vote. It's a belief that we have an agreement
> and if someone disagrees, then we can start voting (or discussing).
>
> Maybe (proposal)
I think Christopher nailed it. Now when I think of it the difference is
that consensus is **not** a vote. It's a belief that we have an agreement
and if someone disagrees, then we can start voting (or discussing).
Maybe (proposal) renaming it to "unanimous vote" would be better. And keep
consensus
I agree consensus is a core value, and I think that word makes sense to use
when describing the important practice of building consensus.
However, I also agree that the term, used as a type of vote, as in
"consensus vote" is confusing and ambiguous. I would be in favor of
updating the docs around
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17894892#comment-17894892
]
Rich Bowen commented on COMDEV-551:
---
[https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/191] w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17894893#comment-17894893
]
Rich Bowen commented on COMDEV-555:
---
[https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/191] w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMDEV-552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17894891#comment-17894891
]
Rich Bowen commented on COMDEV-552:
---
[https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/191] w
TL;DR - https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/191 consolidates duplicate
versions of a few docs.
This PR resolves
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/COMDEV/issues/COMDEV-551
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/COMDEV/issues/COMDEV-552
And
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects
