Out of those, I'd encourage everyone to also take a look at the advisors
which I think if we collectively execute it right, might make a big
difference on how people are perceiving the ASF.
I personally would like that quite a number of people who are active
members will take on the "advisors" rol
I would like to help in the badging working group but I’m currently on
vacation. I will follow-up in 4 weeks or less. I will join efforts if
someone else takes on some initial work before then.
On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 at 11:07 Rich Bowen wrote:
> A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 1:17 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi Rich,
>
> That's great, thanks !
>
> Quick question about wg-advisors: does this WG include "strong" advice
> to the PMC, like legal/trademark/brand advices to avoid issue ?
>
Yes, we should definitely be giving this advice t
Hi Rich,
That's great, thanks !
Quick question about wg-advisors: does this WG include "strong" advice
to the PMC, like legal/trademark/brand advices to avoid issue ?
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 3:06 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a way to or
Hi Rich
That's a fair comment.
We can also take the example of Livy that we were able to "restart"
thanks to new contributors.
Call For Action can also work (as we did for a few projects),
especially when the project is in use.
Regards
JB
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 2:35 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Th
Thanks, folks.
I’ve opened a PR with the feedback from this thread -
https://github.com/apache/comdev-site/pull/174 - and would appreciate a review,
and if you think it passes muster, a merge. Thanks.
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 9:35 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> This week, I’ve been approached by some
A common mistake for leveraging the power of community is to make
it complicated ”what is suitable for newcomers". Working in many OSS
projects, I practice and encourage other maintainers to practice: Do not
think "community" as an external resource and you need to feed them. We're
part of the comm
> * Roadmap -
> a sense of new things that they could help build
> a sense the project is still going someplace
+1 This is what I advise the StreamPark podling every time I meet its
"original author". He shares the challenges that he "cannot find many peers
to collaborate with."
I told him, "Wher
Rich Bowen wrote on 3/29/24 9:35 AM:
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a grea
This is why we emphasize community over code. And Kvrocks can be a valuable
example that although quite a few of its "original authors" faded away due
to many reasons, we keep invite new members and due to its product value (a
well-known software's alternative, named Redis), so it can be maintained
> On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:21 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Thank you for following up.
>
> How would I signal my interest in or join a working group? Maybe I missed
> that part.
I have several answers to this, but the main one is that we’re not sure yet,
and would love your help in defining tha
I can share two examples:
* Livy podling. Users take over the community.
* Ambari. Vendors/Individual Devs revived the community.
But both of them don't seem to be quite active (again).
Best,
tison.
Michael Sokolov 于2024年3月29日周五 22:21写道：
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the proj
On Mar 29, 2024, at 10:20 AM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
>
> I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
> implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
> contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
> point out there can be other p
Thank you for following up.
How would I signal my interest in or join a working group? Maybe I missed
that part.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 29, 2024, 10:06 AM Rich Bowen wrote:
> A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a way to organize and
> make progress on the many pain points around the F
I guess it depends on what the problem with the project is. It seems
implicit in your ideas that the project has lost momentum; nobody is
contributing to it or maintaining it actively? But I just want to
point out there can be other problems that might need correction with
different solutions (too
A month or so ago I started pitching workgroups as a way to organize and make
progress on the many pain points around the Foundation.
We’ve made a little progress since then, but not a lot of follow-up.
The only way that we’re going to have success here is if we build this thing
together, and f
This week, I’ve been approached by someone concerned about one of our projects,
and looking for a “how to get back on track” document, with concrete,
actionable steps that a project can take when it is struggling to find
contributors. This seems like a great doc that we should write. What comes
17 matches
Mail list logo
