Nice discussion! A few comments:
> I do not think that we need projects to opt in to this. Badges are not
aimed at projects. They are aimed at *people*.
Disagree. Projects should have the autonomy to decide if they want to adopt
the ASF badging system for their contributions. I do not see why a p
Hi Rich,
I don't have specific realistic concerns, I am trying to look ahead and
avoid a "how didn't yiu guys think of THIS!" moment 😀
Gary
On Fri, Mar 8, 2024, 12:19 PM Rich Bowen wrote:
> > On Mar 8, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Gary D. Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > Sure, badging can be fun and it sure se
> On Mar 8, 2024, at 12:09 PM, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> Sure, badging can be fun and it sure seems popular on GitHub: I do like my
> Mars 2020 Helicopter Mission badge (https://github.com/garydgregory/) !
>
> I wonder if there are there any privacy issue we should be able to foresee?
>
> I w
Sure, badging can be fun and it sure seems popular on GitHub: I do like my Mars
2020 Helicopter Mission badge (https://github.com/garydgregory/) !
I wonder if there are there any privacy issue we should be able to foresee?
I would guess that badges would be derived from data that a member from t
On Mar 8, 2024, at 9:19 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> I attended a talk last week at FOSS Backstage by Spot Callaway, who started
> the Fedora badges program. He said that the guiding principles are:
>
> * It should be fun, not legalistic.
> * It should celebrate non-code accomplishments at least
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 15:44, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Let me state this more clearly:
>
> >
> > If someone never logged in, they would never see their badges. That is
> > common to all of the badge platforms that I have looked at.
>
> For every badge system I’ve looked at, nobody receives any badges
Let me state this more clearly:
>
> If someone never logged in, they would never see their badges. That is common
> to all of the badge platforms that I have looked at.
For every badge system I’ve looked at, nobody receives any badges until they
log into the system, creating their account. Tha
> On Mar 8, 2024, at 10:24 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> Some people may not want badges; they should not be forced to have
> them if they happen to meet the criteria.
> I agree that opt-in is necessary.
>
If someone never logged in, they would never see their badges. That is common
to all of the badge
On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 at 15:15, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> > I do not think that we need projects to opt in to this. Badges are not
> > aimed at projects. They are aimed at *people*.
>
> I'm not sure about this. Opt-in would be fine with me. I am worried about
> gamification and a flood of PRs just
> I do not think that we need projects to opt in to this. Badges are not aimed
> at projects. They are aimed at *people*.
I'm not sure about this. Opt-in would be fine with me. I am worried about
gamification and a flood of PRs just to get badges. I think experimenting with
a handful of project
> On Mar 3, 2024, at 11:47 AM, Paulo Motta wrote:
>
> I've thought a bit more and rather than starting with multiple badges, it
> probably makes more sense to start with a single badge to validate the
> idea. More can be proposed later if the first one is shown to be effective.
>
> I'd propose
11 matches
Mail list logo
