Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#issuecomment-1962388856 > Inspiring by this simple discussion, I'm taking to try to activate more contributors > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/y1b0x39g3xkh45klmv9ndfj1czcrx4zb > > we w

Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

slawekjaranowski commented on PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#issuecomment-1962385814 Inspiring by this simple discussion, I'm taking to try to activate more contributors https://lists.apache.org/thread/y1b0x39g3xkh45klmv9ndfj1czcrx4zb we w

Re: [PR] Add a chapter about "collaborative" aspect of Advisors [comdev-working-groups]

slawekjaranowski commented on PR #20: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/20#issuecomment-1962335940 > Fingers crossed that we will be able to incentivise enough engaged members and PMCs to make Advisors a useful platformm for this kind of collaboration. Good lu

Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#discussion_r1501401856 ## wg-advisors/red-flags.md: ## @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules. * Discussions are happening off-list. * Too much talk is happening on

Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#discussion_r1501401856 ## wg-advisors/red-flags.md: ## @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules. * Discussions are happening off-list. * Too much talk is happening on

[PR] Add a chapter about "collaborative" aspect of Advisors [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk opened a new pull request, #20: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/20 Having a - potentially - bigger and engaged group of Advisors that can exchange best practices they learn from the project and have the possibility of shaping best practices that other Adviso

Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#issuecomment-1962325653 > Although I'm afraid it's too generic to be a red flag, these are good points. I think one of the good things - assuming we will have a number of advisors advising a num

Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

slawekjaranowski commented on code in PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#discussion_r1501397552 ## wg-advisors/red-flags.md: ## @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules. * Discussions are happening off-list. * Too much talk is ha

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#issuecomment-1962324323 Ready for the next round of reviews. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501396031 ## wg-advisors/red-flags.md: ## @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules. * Has a website external to apache.org * Is missing reports * Is mis

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501395596 ## wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Release process + +## Summary + +ASF project release software following a well defined proc

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501395470 ## wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Release process + +## Summary + +ASF project release software following a well defined proc

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#issuecomment-1962319343 Ready for the next round of reviews :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501388602 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know all members personally, but each member was nomin

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501388411 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know all members personally, but each member was nomin

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501388274 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know all members personally, but each member was nomin

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501387753 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ the indulgence of the PMC, advisor. Do not abuse this relationship. ## FAQ +## How to become an Advisor?

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501387636 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -102,4 +102,37 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know all members personally, but each member was nomin

Re: [PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19#discussion_r1501378100 ## wg-advisors/red-flags.md: ## @@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules. * Discussions are happening off-list. * Too much talk is happening on

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501372589 ## wg-advisors/red-flags.md: ## @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules. * Has a website external to apache.org * Is missing reports * Is mis

[PR] Add next examples that discourages to contributions [comdev-working-groups]

slawekjaranowski opened a new pull request, #19: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/19 I think such issues related to approving PR and finally prepare next release with accepted contributions can have impact for new contributions. -- This is an automated message fro

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501372091 ## wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Release process + +## Summary + +ASF project release software following a well defined proc

Re: [PR] Propose "why" folder that we will keep as "advisors" knowledge base [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #16: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501371159 ## wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md: ## @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +# Release process + +## Summary + +ASF project release software following a well defined proc

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501371004 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -102,4 +109,38 @@ the ASF. Trust is transitive - that is, you may not know all members personally, but each member was nomin

Re: [PR] Add FAQ on how to start (and end) Advisor relationship with PMC [comdev-working-groups]

potiuk commented on code in PR #18: URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/18#discussion_r1501370655 ## wg-advisors/README.md: ## @@ -91,6 +91,13 @@ the indulgence of the PMC, advisor. Do not abuse this relationship. ## FAQ +## How to become an Advisor?