Re: AW: AW: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

2023-07-28 Thread Richard Zowalla
We (Apache OpenNLP, Apache TomEE) have also implemented the suggestion you have made and I’m also very pleased with the results ;-) We include the repo name too. Am 28. Juli 2023 17:02:26 MESZ schrieb Christofer Dutz : >Well … that’s a bit of the problem > >Infra has been giving me quite some

AW: AW: AW: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

2023-07-28 Thread Christofer Dutz
Well … that’s a bit of the problem Infra has been giving me quite some pushback on these changes. That’s why I didn’t just start creating PRs, but also discussing this matter in way too many mailing-lists. So, I could post a perma-link to this thread and hope they’ll accept it, Otherwise we’ll h

Re: AW: AW: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

2023-07-28 Thread hans . van . akelyen
Does this really need a vote? If Infra agrees to change the defaults and it makes your life checking the mailing lists simpler it’s a win for everyone. We (Apache Hop) have also implemented the suggestion you have made and I’m very pleased with the results. As long as it is communicated in a ti

AW: AW: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

2023-07-28 Thread Christofer Dutz
Well, That’s the problem … I am not sure who has the authority to vote on this. The only thing I know is that when I tried bringing this up, I was guided from A to B, then from B to C, and on it goes. I think the issue is one rendering the mailing lists of many of our projects pretty much usele

Re: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

2023-07-28 Thread rbowen
On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 16:11 -0400, Kelly Oglesbee wrote: > exactly what emails are you changing, because I'm experiencing > problems > with my emails on my device? Can you elaborate? What problems are you experiencing? How can the situation be improved? --

Re: AW: Changing the defaults for GitHub generated email titles?

2023-07-28 Thread rbowen
On Thu, 2023-07-27 at 19:46 +, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Ok, > > so after the discussion didn’t come up with any objections. I > prepared a PR and that was merged today. > Now the templates no longer have to have a mandatory “repository” > variable ;-) > > I updated the PLC4X settings and it s